User talk:Orbiston

I think The Controller is using a professional company to "tidy up" his image. Changes are rapid and very nervous. The facts about the breakdown of his marriage are well known and Broadcast magazine couldn't be a more reliable source. If Murphy doesn't like it, then he should ask for a retraction from the magazine and I will rethink. In the meantime it stays as it is.

This entry, which barely merits life as a stub, is littered with PR nonsense. Wikipedia is not the place for

self promotion or PR puff. This reeks of PR puff.

Image:Information.svg Hello, I'm Tiptoety. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, :Stuart Murphy, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tiptoety ^talk 02:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Orbiston. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The thread is {{{thread}}}. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic :{{{1}}}.}} Thank you. Tiptoety ^talk 05:35, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at :Stuart Murphy. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Tiptoety ^talk 02:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

This is your only warning, continuing your battleground behavior in the Stuart Murphy article will get you blocked. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stuart_Murphy&diff=prev&oldid=506770437 Accusing] other editors of being PR staff or friends of the subject, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stuart_Murphy&diff=prev&oldid=508952037 accusing] other editors of being vandals, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stuart_Murphy&diff=508295231&oldid=506981221 and] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stuart_Murphy&diff=508932026&oldid=508930162 edit] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stuart_Murphy&diff=508938791&oldid=508933874 warring][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stuart_Murphy&diff=508951763&oldid=508942918 is] the quickest way to get there. Please read Wikipedia:Disputes for the best ways to handle these situations.--v/r - TP 00:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

{{checkuserblock-account}}