User talk:Pepe.is.great

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I only did that to his page as he kept harassing me and accusing me of being a sock puppet. I am sorry I act in this way next time I will act in a more appropriate manner.Pepe.is.great (talk) 11:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC) | decline = No grounds here to consider lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 11:51, 20 May 2017 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I again apologise but :Morty C-137 started harassing me first for having a different view on the Independent being a reliable source calling me a Nazi which is very offensive he was warned but continued doing it so I felt I had no other choice. Pepe.is.great (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2017 (UTC) | decline = I see where Morty C-137 said "the brand new "Pepe.is.great" person's name is a pretty obvious reference or callout to white supremacist icon "Pepe the Frog"" and noted that you edited an article about a Nazi tank, but I don't see where they actually called you a Nazi. If I have missed it and you want to reiterate the accusation, please provide a specific diff, but if you make the accusation again without proof then you run the risk of having your talk page access revoked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed | 1=talk this is the page where he accuses me of being a Nazi and a sockpuppet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Milonica/Archive_14#The_Cdg_account_again Pepe.is.great (talk) 12:35, 20 May 2017 (UTC) | decline = I don't see it either. It's not a reason to vandalize someone's userpage at any rate. Kuru (talk) 14:06, 20 May 2017 (UTC)}}

• Yes, that is the talk page I read and which I quoted when I declined your previous unblock request. As you have now made the accusation again without providing a specific dif, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page for the duration of the block. The next reviewing admin is welcome to reinstate it if they feel it will be of benefit. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:40, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Not helpful, Pepe. You are engaging in disruptive editing, and are not paying attention to how this kind of thing affects not only the person whose userpage you are vandalizing but many other editors who are involved in your conflict with him. It's like smashing into someone's car because you don't like the way they are driving— you end up hitting pedestrians, someone's dog, and damaging a traffic light as well. It isn't helpful, it's mean, and while it may make you feel good for 30 seconds, the repercussions go on for days for lots of other people you may not even be aware of. If you want to edit Wikipedia, you will need to learn to be less willing to play tit-for-tat, even if the "other guy" starts the fight. Everyone can see your edit history, can read everything you have ever done here, and none of it makes you look adult yet. The people who owned the dog will never forgive you. It's not okay. You gotta stop doing this. KDS4444 (talk) 06:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)