User talk:Persephone19

|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

|}

|}

You addition of material on Bohm and co is welcome, but I cannot see why you have started a completely new section. doesn't it belong under "Examples" ? 1Z 11:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi! I've fixed up the citations list on Quantum mind to use the ref tags. Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to use the citations system built in to wikipedia. You should never be manually numbering citations. fraggle (talk) 21:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I see you are interested in uncommon research fields. I would like to hear a little about your background, and maybe share my thoughts on the subjects and it's ramification. thank you.02:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I see you are interested in uncommon research fields. I would like to hear a little about your background, and maybe share my thoughts on the subjects and it's ramification. thank you. 02:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)~

Hi. I see you are interested in uncommon research fields. I would like to hear a little about your background, and maybe share my thoughts on the subjects and it's ramification. thank you. --Procrastinating@^talk2me 02:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

:Hallo. Sorry to be so long in replying. I haven't had time to look at Wikepedia much lately, however I was back today to try to do some editing on the Orch OR article, where there is felt to be a problem with accessibility for the general reader. As to my background, I would say I was an independent researcher, which means basically just interested in the subject of consciousness and particularly quantum consciousness as developed by people such as Penrose/Hameroff, Bernroider and David Bohm. I don't have a physics or neuroscience background, but I have spent the last 20 or so years privately studying relevant areas. I was many years in the financial sector. Not a helpful background, although it does provide some insight into the way that authoritative nonsense can drown out any attempt at rational discussion or evidence. My website is www.quantum-mind.co.uk. This is not original stuff, but tries to give some general account plus summaries/reviews of a range of articles and books on the subject and a reference list. Persephone19 (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

:::Dear Persephone, could you send me your e-mail in order not to pollute Wikipedia pages with our discussion. Is your email the one provided at the bottom of this page [http://www.quantum-mind.co.uk/danko-georgiev-2-c171.html Quantum Mind.uk]? For example on the page provided is written "Studies (3. & 4.) showed that tubulin tails interacted directly with synaptotagmin-1, a protein that offsets the otherwise destabilising influence of Ca2+ ions at axon terminals". This is not correct claim. Neuroscience is not difficult, just those who do neuroscience know many facts, a lot of terminology and can see small details to be critical. For example, Ca2+ is not destabilizing in presynaptic terminals, all these proteins are Ca2+ stable, because for every synaptic vesicle release the presynaptic Ca2+ must raise to very high concentrations. However in other places in the neuron not the presynaptic end, the Ca2+ concentrations are much much lower down to nanoM. Since it is known that Ca2+ destructs microtubules the question is - is it possible to have microtubules in the presynaptic space, where the Ca2+ should have depolimerizing action upon MT? And experimental studies showed that synaptotagmin, which is the Ca2+ sensor in exocytosis [1] might bind to microtubules and [2] might stabilize them against the depolymerizing action of high Ca2+. Also anatomical evidence has been found that microtubules can run into the active zone, so I come up with the idea of microtubules controling exocytosis around 2003-2004. This is just hypothesis, and might actually need adaptor proteins like ELKS2/CAST to be interposed between the microtubule and the synaptic vesicle. Danko Georgiev MD (talk) 02:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

I have just posted some comment here(!) on Hameroff's video response. I did not have time to comment on all wrong things he said, but picked up something apparently wrong about the molecular biology of microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins. Danko Georgiev (talk) 08:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

: Dear Persephone19, I did some clean-up of the quantum mind article. You can check how it looks after using the citation templates. Also I proposed deletion of copy-pasted citations, which serve no purpose - Talk:Quantum_mind#How_citations_help_justify_the_speculations_by_Bernroider_or_Hameroff.3F Danko Georgiev (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)