User talk:Petepetepetepete

Your proposal to merge the articles: RGSW and AO.

::{{done}} Please help with any other info to be added. Removal of duplicated material, and of course, the old "double redirects!" Thanks, Btline (talk) 18:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi Petepetepetepete,

Thanks for your note. I've made my case for reinstating the above entry on the discussion page. Please have a look at it. In essence, if the fleeting nature of a town's history cannot be recorded, then history as it is portrayed becomes exclusive not inclusive. Bye for now, Rhodian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhodian (talk • contribs) 20:12, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

It's actually tucked away in the talk page archives, see here and here Which team did he play for, as from what I can tell he played for the all-Ireland team for the majority of his caps? Thanks. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 15:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

:Are you saying he played for Ireland national football team (1882-1950)? As (according to the article) that continued to be an all-Ireland team while he was playing, and didn't even become "Northern Ireland" till well after Scott stopped playing. In addition that's backed up by [http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/local/article3136225.ece this] which says he played for "Ireland" in 1928 and [http://www.irelandssaturdaynight.co.uk/kicks/article3152968.ece this] describes him as an "Irish International". So unless I've got this totally wrong, he never even played for a team called "Northern Ireland"?! One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 20:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

::If it really bothers you that much, describe him as Northern Irish. Just don't say he was born there please :) One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 00:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

What is the earliest publication date for this, as far as you know? Or when was the club founded? I'm doing some research on the tune. Pustelnik (talk) 19:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. I'll let you know if anythings comes from the rest of the search. Pustelnik (talk) 22:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

You recently made comments about this article on its talk page. ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/{{#if:. JMcC (talk) 16:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ==

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ==

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

{{ {{#ifeq:|{{void}}|void|Error:must be substituted}}|PRODWarning}}

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article The Bandwagon Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:Notability asserted but unsourced; tagged for ten months.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tl|dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{tl|dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rodhullandemu 14:49, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ==

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ==

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Pete (x4), I have just asked her personally whether she is an OBE or not; I will gladly revert it she really is! As there was no original reference for this, let's leave it out until we know? PETE, I HAVE SPOKEN TO SHEFALI: SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN O.B.E. AND WAS BORN IN MUMBAI, INDIA.

Martin

91.110.236.38 (talk) 21:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

The Articles for Deletion discussion for 2008 World Finals Odds which you participated in was closed due to a procedural matter. The disussion is opened again at at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 World Finals Odds (2nd nomination). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 01:54, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Please give your input.There is a dispute http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Thierry_henry--Kevinharte (talk) 03:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

::Hi Petepetepetepete ! We now have a first review for GA. On the whole it doesn't look too bad. As you know, I am a local resident in absentia, and as a published author, a 'prose artist', but anything you can do to improve the language or address some of the more technical points as quickly as possible would be much appreciated. Any work on the new referencing system does not affect the overall quality and scope of the article for GA but you may be able to put some of the wrong referencing things right and offer some suggestions on the other points made by the reviewer. It would be great for the Worcs project to have a GA of this envergure in its repertoire. See Talk:Malvern, Worcestershire#GA Review - and Happy New Year!--Kudpung (talk) 06:00, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello {{PAGENAME}}! A non-British user seems to be attempting to suggest that the Brits are not pronouncing their own British place names correctly, and appears to believe that it is a policy of Wikipedia to instruct the Brits, through the use of the IPA, how British English should be pronounced. He/she also seems to be of the opinion that it is Wikipedia policy to regard British English by default as a rhotic language, which it is not. Some British Wikipedians are trying to avoid an edit conflict and have requested my support. I have added my comments to the debate the non-British user has has started in defence of his/her multiple, WP:BOLD? changes to IPA pronunciations of British place names. As a professional linguist I accord every version of English its own particular merits and my position here strictly concerns the way in which the IPA is interpreted and applied in the Wikipedia, and how the current policy may need to be changed through a truly representative consensus. If you would like to help resolve this issue, please see User talk:Kudpung#IPA, RP, etc. and User talk:Lfh#Warwickshire to get the background. Maybe you could then chime in with your views on the subject at Wikipedia talk:IPA for English#Rhoticity in place names. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 18:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

; Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

; Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

; Content : Is more content needed?

; Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

; Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?

; Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

; Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the [http://www.grouplens.org/node/494 SuggestBot study page].

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Worcestershire - one of England's oldest and still existing (with some minor boundary changes) ceremonial and political shires, famous for its nearly 1000 year old cathedral, the River Severn, the AONB of the Malvern Hills, some of the oldest schools in the country, England's fastest growing university, apples, pears, cider and cricket, and of course its world famous sauce. The Wikiproject is now in need of some attention. Created 12 years ago, this project amassed a huge resource for editors working on all kinds of articles and categories related in some way or another to the county. Kudpung is more or less retired from Wikipedia getting on for 2 years ago and it would be good if a group of editors could get it up to date and continue to maintain it.
Opt out of this message list here.
WikiProject Worcestershire 14:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

|}