It's a start. N.G.G. 23:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
:Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome contributions from all - however. Can I question the creation of this task force. Not that we don't need it, just that I wonder one whether the author warrants such a task force yet, also whether there is enough support for such collaboration yet (not demonstrated), and there appears to have been no discussion about the need - support before creation. Open to be shown wrong but please talk to us. We are here to help. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
I think that several people will soon join the PJ Task Force. Look, the Percy Jackson articles need to be edited by a collaboration of editors, otherwise their condition will always be poor. I have invited two members to join the task force and am sure that they will join. Soon, we will have many editors in the task force. And the Percy Jackson books require a task force. They are one of the bestselling books of Amazon.com. None of the PJ articles in Wikipedia are better than C-class, so I think that a task force is required for improvement. Pmlinediter (talk) 09:40, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
:Highly fashionable does not yet mean important. However I will rest that one! Creating a task force and then asking for support is back to front, you should garner a modicum of support first and agreed the need. All you have done is assert the articles are currently in need, agreed but so are 95% of literature article many on more importance material. Having said all that now the deed is done I will attempt to give all the help and support I can. Ask any questions you might have. I have fixed the broken, {{t1|WPNOVELS}} template by the way and adjusted the banner instructions on the main page. Support for this task force will be needed before too long but lets do some other things first. How many articles are well currently talking about. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Look, I didn't create the task force, NGG did, but I did ask for its creation. And concerning the number of articles, I would place it at above 20. Actually, I am creating an article now so that would approximately make it 21. But this is an estimate since many articles have been created, but have not been merged with the project template. On the other hand, if you really want to help, please join the Task Force. And sign your posts. Pmlinediter (talk) 09:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
::Oops sorry about the signature. I'm not getting at you you just happened to have you head above the parapet at the time. I will join, but as you will find joining and actually doing work are two different things. I will do what I can to assist. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't realize what you mean about the parapet part.Pmlinediter (talk) 10:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
:An idiom meaning "you were active". :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)