User talk:Qhairun

| style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

|}

|}

Image:Information.svg Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, :Jakaya Kikwete, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 08:48, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Pls review WP:ORDER.Moxy-File:Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg 13:36, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. freshacconci (✉) 14:43, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, Qhairun. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siti Sarah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, Qhairun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siti Sarah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3ASiti+Sarah request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Quairon, here are the actual flags Kadoi [https://www.academia.edu/17410816/_On_the_Timurid_flag_in_Beitr%C3%A4ge_zur_islamischen_Kunst_und_Arch%C3%A4ologie_Band_2_Wiesbaden_Reichert_2010_pp_143_62] is referring to as potential Timurid candidates. पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 09:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

{{multiple image|perrow=3|total_width=600|caption_align=center

| align = center

| direction =horizontal

| image1 = Catalan Atlas black flag in Yuka Kadoi, Plate 10.png

| image2 = Catalan Atlas balck flags from Plate 10.png

| image3 = Catalan Atlas black flag from plate 11.png

| footer=

}}

I have developped a paragraph about Timur's flag [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timurid_Empire#Symbols_of_the_state]. Overall, I think that the flag in the infobox is wrong (it is not even from the Catalan Atlas), and is original research. I think we should remove it. Comments welcome. पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 15:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from :Indonesian occupation of East Timor into :Gerald Ford. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from page name; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Sierra Leone#Bangla language and earlier discussions to understand why consensus is that Bengali should not be listed as an official language of Sierra Leone. --Worldbruce (talk) 10:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of official languages by country and territory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mehri. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

I've reverted your edit as it contradicts the UN document which explicitly states Mexico as having recognized Palestine, even giving us a date. Semsûrî (talk) 13:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Please review Wikipedia:Verifiability. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karamanids&diff=prev&oldid=1235493693 This] edit summary of yours indicates that you do not understand this core policy. It is the editor's responsibility to cite reliable sources that explicitly support content added to Wikipedia, not for other editors to provide sources that disprove it. R Prazeres (talk) 15:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hi Qhairun. I've blocked you from moving pages for a period of 24 hours for move-warring an article related to a contentious topic. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 13:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Qhairun ,

In the WP:ARBPIA topic area, editors are only allowed to make a single revert within a 24 hour period.

You have made five. Please self-revert all that you can to bring yourself back into compliance, and please be more careful in the future:

1. {{diff2|1256148340|13:37, 8 November 2024}}
2. {{diff2|1256143674|13:02, 8 November 2024}}
3. {{diff2|1256142133|12:50, 8 November 2024}}
4. {{diff2|1256141554|12:45, 8 November 2024}}
5. {{diff2|1256141438|12:44, 8 November 2024}}

BilledMammal (talk) 13:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your recent additions to the Israeli war crimes article. Can you please ensure when importing material from other articles that you make a note of it in your edit summary, with the article they are from linked in the summary? Additionally, a couple of your edits were summarized as correcting typos, but you were changing sources. In some of these, I've had to track down the original source when the material stated in wiki text was not covered by the sources provided. Please be sure to double check that the content of your edits is covered by the sources provided. When you see a named reference source (ie, 'entropyandvodka | talk 06:18, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at :Goyim Defense League, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 18:15, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

It says:

There is consensus that outside of the topic of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, the ADL is a generally reliable source, including for topics related to hate groups and extremism in the U.S. There is no consensus that ADL must be attributed in all cases, but there is consensus that the labelling of organisations and individuals by the ADL (particularly as antisemitic) should be attributed. Some editors consider the ADL's opinion pieces not reliable, and that they should only be used with attribution. In the 2024 RfC, there was rough consensus that the hate symbol database is reliable for the existence of a symbol and for straightforward facts about it, but not reliable for more complex details, such as symbols' history. In-text attribution to the ADL may be advisable when it is cited in such cases. Doug Weller talk 18:18, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Don't revert to copy unless there's a reason to do so. That just makes the page unstable. If you're trying to retrieve something from a previous state of the page, use the edit history. The entire history of the page is available in the page's edit history, and you can view any previous state of the page there (without reverting). See WP:PAGEHIST ButlerBlog (talk) 18:47, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Besides the fact you are using a blog and shouldn't, this is to recent and all "allegedly" and "suspect".. If there's a conviction, you can add it then with new sources. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

I presume you won't do this again. Doug Weller talk 15:25, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

:You're still doing this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gaza_war_protests&diff=prev&oldid=1277096389]. Looking at your edit summaries, it appears one of the disconnects here is that you are using "links" when you mean "reference" or "citation". If you're adding references/citations to an article, that's fine, that's not what we mean by "links". ButlerBlog (talk) 19:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Qhairun. Thank you.) JayCubby 01:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

I notice you sometimes (eg https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Exploding_trousers&curid=6946381&diff=1288231764&oldid=1288172847 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamas_baby_beheading_hoax&diff=prev&oldid=1288235220) add sources where the access-date parameter is the date on the article you are using as a source. This is not correct - see Template:Cite news which says "Full date when the content pointed to by url was last verified to support the text in the article", so it would typically be the date when you actually make the edit. Pinkbeast (talk) 13:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page :Israeli war crimes, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israeli_war_crimes&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1288533030%7CIsraeli%20war%20crimes%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qhairun§ion=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Israeli war crimes}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1288533030 report it to my operator].

Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:50, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from reverting the article of deletion tag. There is a process with appealing but it needs to be handled through proper channels and include a moderator. Medievalonion (talk) 01:34, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited December 2008 air strikes in the Gaza Strip, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Saturday.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC)