User talk:Quetstar#Linux KERNEL
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
| age =2160
| archiveprefix =User talk:Quetstar/Archive
| numberstart =1
| maxarchsize =75000
| header ={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minkeepthreads =5
| format = %%i
}}{{Archives|bot=ClueBot III|age=90}}
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Standard notification: Syrian Civil War
| 50px | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
:As a note, per these community-authorized general sanctions, there is a one-revert rule in place for all articles related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. This means that an editor in this area may make no more than one revert per article per 24 hour period, unless an obvious exception applies. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:34, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
January 2025
File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Freedoxm. I noticed that you recently removed content from :Syria without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 23:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
:@Quetstar: I have pinged you on Syria's talk page so that people can decide on using it. Ik its controversial that "Suriyā" is used but as always you can check the arabic version of the article, and you will see it has usage of "Suriyā". Thanks. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 00:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
[[Talk:Syria]] discussion
Please respond regarding your edits at Talk:Syria. Thank you. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 00:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
:@Freedoxm I have responded. Thanks. Quetstar (talk) 00:54, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
::no problem. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 00:56, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
In my revert of Ba'athis Syria I wrote the wrong text
I wanted to write "Use the talk page. By amazing coincidence, no one complained about the photos before you came here with your subjective opinion." Algirr (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
:I did so because 1: there were way too many images, 2: their quality was poor and 3: they made the sections look awful to read. Quetstar (talk) 18:47, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
::1. No one complained about their size except you, and you didn't even bother to create a consensus.
::2. The quality of the photographs corresponded to the historical periods in which they were taken.
::3. Again, this is just your subjective opinion and no one had a request to do this. Algirr (talk) 20:56, 9 May 2025 (UTC)