User talk:Randykitty#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxim Davydov

{{wikibreak|message= I will be offline the coming days, until about February 15. If you need an admin, please go to WP:AN. If you came here because I speedily deleted an article, please see WP:REFUND first. If you have questions/problems concerning academic journals, {{u|Headbomb}} is very knowledgeable on this subject and always very helpful. Thanks.}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|maxarchivesize = 100K

|counter = 35

|minthreadsleft = 0

|algo = old(7d)

|archive = User talk:Randykitty/Archive %(counter)d

}}

Before posting here, please READ THIS FIRST

Hi, and welcome to my User Talk page! For new discussions, please add your comments at the very bottom and use a section heading (e.g., by using the "+" tab, or, depending on your settings, the "new section" tab at the top of this page). I will respond on this page unless specifically requested otherwise. I dislike talk-back templates and fragmented discussions. If I post on your page you may assume that I will watch it for a response. If you post here I will assume the same (and that you lost interest if you stop following the discussion).

[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit§ion=new}} START A NEW TALK TOPIC.]

The Tausch draft

In view of the incomplete presentation of the Austrian political science community on the English-language pages of Wikipedia, I believe it would be appropriate for the decision-making bodies to decide whether to accept or reject the substantially revised draft. After all, the current draft contains Hartmut Elsenhans' account of Arno Tausch's academic work, as published in the commemorative Springer publication. Further information on Hartmut Elsenhans can be found on Wikipedia. Sozioökonom (talk) 14:59, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

That draft is still an unencyclopedic mess. If somebody tags it for speedy deletion (G11) it would most certainly be deleted. In no way is this ready for main article space. --Randykitty (talk) 15:28, 15 June 2025 (UTC)