User talk:RobMeagherSAT

{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse/Questions|Specific guidance requested to help get article approved|ts=DES ^(talk) 18:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)}}

{{talkback|DESiegel|Can you help? Article declined for 2nd time, with new reasons|ts=20:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC)}}

detailed comments on sources DES ^(talk) 20:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, RobMeagherSAT. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sacred Attention Therapy".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}} or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 04:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, RobMeagherSAT. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{tl|request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.{{#ifexpr: ({{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}} - 20190130173731) < 5000000000 | {{PAGENAME}} | }} Theroadislong (talk) 17:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

:And please stop your tendentious, and clearly promotional, editing at once. Your edits to Humanistic psychology, Transpersonal psychology, and Psychotherapy were wrong in several ways. Your inexperience with Wikipedia may excuse the fault of linking from an article to a draft, but a little thought will surely show that the material in a draft has in general had no oversight (and may in fact never become part of the encyclopaedia), and it is not appropriate to link to it from an article.

:More serious is the nature of your edits: linking a general term ("spiritual aspiration/psychology") to one particular approach is, in my view, misleading, disruptive, and intellectually dishonest. --ColinFine (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

::I apologise: I've cooled down a little now, and I withdraw that last accusation. I understand, I think, that you believe that you have something so valuable that you have to tell the world about it. But that is not what Wikipedia is for. --ColinFine (talk) 22:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Image:copyright-problem.svgHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page :Draft:Sacred Attention Therapy, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the [//www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GNU Free Documentation License], Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.—Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:52, 14 February 2019 (UTC)