User talk:Rpgon2
I ask you please not to vandalism my own talk page with the vandalism templates. I have not lowered myself to such level and would expect the same from yourself. We are both editors with differing view points, it is natural we disagree, but lets keep it at an intellectual level. Ncwfl (talk) 20:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
::You are actually vandalising that article. You kept deleting documented sources, and adding non-relevant (and undocumented) information. You are using wikipedia for your own propaganda purposes. Rpgon2 (talk) 09:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Revert Report
Image:Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war{{#if:Neocatechumenal Way| according to the reverts you have made on :Neocatechumenal Way}}. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}
WP:AN/3RR Ncwfl (talk) 17:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
:::This is funny. Ncwfl reverts any relevant and documented material that I add there. Then comes here to write "you performed a large number of reversions". Funny, very funny.
May 2008
MedCab
{{ambox
| type = notice
| image = 50px
| imageright = 50px
| style = CSS value
| textstyle = text-align: center;
| text = {{#switch: a |a=A MedCab case involving you has been opened, please accept or decline at Talk:Neocatechumenal Way.|b=Your MedCab case has been opened by me, and I am contacting any other involved parties.}} If you accept, please give your view on the matter at Talk:Neocatechumenal Way. Soxred 93 04:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
}}