User talk:Rsrikanth05/Archive March 2014

Why did you remove my addition to the cast list? The billing is empirically correct. Look at the credits of the movie itself if you don't believe me.

Best,

Michael Schlesinger

aka Cadavra8 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadavra8 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

:Hi, I removed it because it wasn't sourced. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

It isn't sourced? It's in the credits of the movie itself. Twice. Once at the beginning and again at the end. You can't get a better source than that! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadavra8 (talk • contribs) 08:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

::{lease see this page. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

That page lists one definition of a source as "the piece of work itself." If the credits of the movie itself are not authoritative, what else can be? I simply can't understand why you aren't grasping this. Go rent the film and watch it yourself if you don't believe me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadavra8 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

:I'm way too dumb to grasp all this. Go ahead and add it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thanks, but don't put yourself down! :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadavra8 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

::Doing. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Rsrikanth05,

Please Google Matthew Revelation to verify. Although it was not added as a reference the entry is valid.

Thanks,

Steve Johnson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.242.132.209 (talk) 15:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

:Heya, I only undid it because of the lack of sources. Can you cite either a book or a news source, or anything that has been published by a reliable source? If you can, feel free to add it, if needed, I can add it. That's all. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

The only reference would be the entry at the top of Google. Does that suffice?

Thanks, Steve — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.242.132.209 (talk) 14:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

:I guess, it could. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

I'm concerned that someone else will revert the change and the reference if it simply refers to the Bible study on Matthew and Revelation, since it is a blog. I'll see if I can get an outside reference.

Thanks, Steve — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.242.132.209 (talk) 15:05, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

:Sure, that'd be great. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

::(test) ? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Hey Rsrikantho05,

You posted on my take page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fogest#Huron_Heights_Secondary_School_.28Kitchener.29

I would just like to reply to you. I am a student at the school, that is how I am able to fill in the information. My information is correct, but we have no resources to cite for this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fogest (talk • contribs) 05:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

::Unforutantely, Wikipedia needs references. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:18, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

I have added an additional ALT hook at the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Nils_Kock DYK nomination] of Nils Kock; your comments appreciated. Thank for your input, GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 21:18, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

:{{done}} --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:20, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

{{tmbox

|type = notice

|image = Image:Updated DYK query.svg

|text = On 12 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rajani Pandit, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Rajani Pandit, regarded as Maharashtra's first female private detective, reportedly worked undercover as domestic help for six months while solving a case? {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at .|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Rajani Pandit|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rajani Pandit.|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Rajani Pandit|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Rajani Pandit.}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Rajani_Pandit&datefrom=2014-03-01&dateto=2014-03-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201403/Rajani_Pandit daily totals]), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}} Another good hook. Cheers. Victuallers (talk) 09:52, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

:Thanks a lot Big R! --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:58, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

::Do say if you want more help ..... a woman dyk for womens history month? Victuallers (talk) 08:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

:::Will do. If something comes up. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk)`

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:40, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

:Jee, thanks. What do I get this for however? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:24, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

{{tmbox

|type = notice

|image = Image:Updated DYK query.svg

|text = On 26 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Foldscope, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Foldscope, a microscope made out of cardstock that costs under US$1, was designed to help detect 12 disease-causing organisms? {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at .|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Foldscope|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Foldscope.|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Foldscope|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Foldscope.}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Foldscope&datefrom=2014-03-01&dateto=2014-03-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201403/Foldscope daily totals]), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}} Thanks for this contribution from me and the DYK projectVictuallers (talk) 07:32, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

:Thanks a lot Roger! --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

::Your welcome .... nice work Victuallers (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)