User talk:SOAD KoRn

http://www.xs4all.nl/~kassiesa/bert/uefa/data/method3/crank2007.html

Please familiarize yourself with updated rankings before changing them.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirillz (talk • contribs) 20:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

does any one know when tickets will go on sale for the rumble at san antonio

We go by when wrestlers WIN the titles, WWE follows kayfabe and goes by when it airs on TV. TJ Spyke 23:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Nice work translating the Pixies articles (especially Surfer Rosa) to the Portuguese Wikipedia; keep it up! CloudNine 19:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited André Gaspar Murta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited João Sousa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BES. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

:CDP Awards

::added a link pointing to Athletics

:João Sousa

::added a link pointing to Público

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article João Sousa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 20px This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 02:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

The article João Sousa you nominated as a good article has failed 20px; see Talk:João Sousa for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 02:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Portugal Davis Cup team representatives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

{{GOCEtb|article=João Sousa|sign=Cheers,Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)}}

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frederico Gil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portuguese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

{{tmbox

|type = notice

|image = Image:Updated DYK query.svg

|text = On 6 December 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frederico Marques, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Portuguese tennis coach Frederico Marques was recently reported to be the youngest coach with a player in the ATP top 100? {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at .|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Frederico Marques|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frederico Marques.|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Frederico Marques|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Frederico Marques.}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Frederico_Marques&datefrom=2015-12-01&dateto=2015-12-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201512/Frederico_Marques daily totals]), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}} Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frederico Gil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Olá, I have a question: what do the colors in the "Head-to-head against top 20 players" mean? Particularly the beige in the last column? There's no key for them and I'm not sure whether they are really necessary. Cumps. Parutakupiu (talk) 19:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

:Oh, ok, I got it: white for wins, beige for losses. Still, unexplained and seems purely decorative. Parutakupiu (talk) 19:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

::{{u|Parutakupiu}}, that's it. Quite frankly, I agree with you, it has no practical use. I left it there when I adapted the table from other articles. I will remove it in a sec. SOAD KoRn (talk) 20:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited João Sousa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Record. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

{{GOCEtb|article = Gonçalo Nicau|sign = Corinne (talk) 19:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)}}

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited João Sousa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Singles. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, SOAD KoRn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Please be careful with the non-guideline tennis charts. You are creating a lot of work for us to correct here at Tennis project. The proper consensus charts can be found at the Tennis Project Guideline page. We do not use flagathlete, we do not color the court type, etc... Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:44, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

:Hello, {{ping|User:Fyunck(click)}} I follow the guidelines in most of my edits here, but for some work I get inspiration from Youzhny's career statistics. It is a featured list, which goes in accordance with higher level of standards than what is presented at the the Tennis Project Guideline page. I don't mean to say anything ill regarding any consensus found at WikiProject Tennis, but whenever there is a chance to improve, you have to seize it.

:For instance, Flagathlete is considerably more helpful than flagicon for WP:ACCESS. You may not use it, but that does not mean my adoption is incorrect. That is why what you presented me are guidelines, not hard rules. Regarding court type coloring, it is just something I adopted from Youzhny's page. However, I can remove it and not include it in new articles. I agree that its presence (or lack of it) is just a matter of aesthetics.

:Let me know your thoughts about this. Regards, SOAD KoRn (talk) 10:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

:PS: I have been away for awhile due to professional reasons, but I hope to catch up with the time lost as soon as possible. SOAD KoRn (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

::At tennis project we determined it is not more useful to have the flagathlete and it detracts visually. We have had other featured list articles that do not use it such as Milos Raonic, so just because it passed featured list does not make it a better. Many have no clue as to what country codes mean since some countries are very obscure. Even ESP is unknown to many English speakers. It make the column-widths longer, where with players like Roger Federer, every inch matters on a computer screen. And where you could scroll over the flag and get the country name, in flagathlete you have to scroll over the country code. I have no idea how it made feature list with a broken-wrapped doubles chart, non-standard court colors, and so many redlinked players who have no business be linked at all. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

:::{{ping|User:Fyunck(click)}} Well, it will not be me who is going to work differently around here. I respect your work and everything WikiProject Tennis has done to promote the sport at Wikipedia, and I understand the point that you are stressing. I will change every Portuguese tennis related articles that I've been working on. You don't need to worry about correcting them. Regards, SOAD KoRn (talk) 11:34, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

::::And it's not like we don't try to take new things into account. A new chart is in the works since some like to go against the grain and add a non-consensus number column. There are always kinks but it looks something like this:

::::Current charts

::::

::::proposed charts

::::

::::So we have looked at not having the color go all the way across as you have done. Cheers. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited João Sousa career statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Zverev. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

I notice that you create many new player bios and career statistics articles. Your input would be much appreciated.

Please give some thoughts at our project guideline page on a new finals chart proposal. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

I waited a couple months and since the new tennis guideline section is ready to go live I thought I would ask a few of you if you see any glaring spelling or clarity mistakes. New Section, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tennis/Article_guidelines#.234:Career Old Section] There was also talk about how to handle Future and Challenger Tiers but that can always be brought in as an easy addendum since it's not replacing anything we already have. The only thing I have a query about is how to handle W–L if someone creates a Challenger or Futures chart (or dual charts as often happens). Charts I've seen usually have no numbering or a running total of events rather than wins and losses. There should be no problem incorporating the same W–L for those charts. But what about charts that include both Futures and Challengers? Do we W–L them all together like they were the same event? Or do we do separate W–L's for them even though they are in the same chart? Again this can be brought up afterwards but it is a concern. I mainly wanted to make sure everything was crystal clear as to meaning in the replacement section. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, SOAD KoRn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spanish Caravan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robvanvee 08:52, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:14, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello and welcome back to Wikipedia! I see that you have edited recently, and wanted to let you know that I removed you from the list of missing Wikipedians. If you ever decide to take another wikibreak or retire (which I hope you don’t!), you can leave a message on your user page. Glad to see you’re back! Happy editing, Lima Bean Farmer Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 03:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello SOAD KoRn! I hope you are doing well. I just wanted to let you know that I added you to Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. If you ever come back, or choose not to have your name on this list, just let me know. Hope you come back, even just to check in, Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 21:53, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

A number of "Top ten male doubles tennis players" templates, at least one of which you created, have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Top ten male doubles tennis players templates. Nigej (talk) 08:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Fred Gil career statistics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Excessive detail for a player who never even reached the top 50. Fails WP:NOTSTATS/WP:UNDUE, sufficiently treated in his biographical article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)