User talk:SU ltd.

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation

See the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine&diff=532676015&oldid=532675786#SIECUS.2C_Masked_depression_article.2C_and_clarifying_again_what_are_appropriate_medical_sources discussion] initiated by {{u|Flyer22}}. --SU ltd. (talk) 21:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, SU ltd. Since you're new to editing the English Wikipedia, and since it seems that other language Wikipedias you have edited differ significantly in detail with regard to their policies and guidelines (unless you weren't too familiar with theirs either), here is a Welcome template:

|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top"|

|}

|}

Hi, Flyer22! I was away and had no Internet access. Thank you, I’m very glad to have received welcome from a Wikipedian who is familiar with sexology very well. And thanks a lot for [https://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=EEG+and+orgasm&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp&ei=xzb0UJ_vBsv-2QW36IHADw&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.1357700187,d.b2U&fp=d7c9ec1ffb68d838&biw=1360&bih=590 your bibliography] again.

As for policies and guidelines here, I know them in general. But I hadn’t heard of Wikipedia:Verifiability#Non-English sources and WP:MEDRS guidelines before you drew my attention to them. So it is expedient to add these two of your references:

• WP:NOENG
• Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)

--SU ltd. (talk) 16:08, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

::You're welcome, and good to know that you'll be keeping that policy and guideline in mind. Flyer22 (talk) 16:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

:::And, of course, I'd gotten [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine&diff=533975807&oldid=533975740#SIECUS.2C_Masked_depression_article.2C_and_clarifying_again_what_are_appropriate_medical_sources your message] at WP:MED about the temporary absence of Internet access. Thanks for letting me know before disappearing for a week. Flyer22 (talk) 16:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

• And thank you for bringing WP:Blockquote to my attention. --SU ltd. (talk) 05:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Classical conditioning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oxon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

{{talkback|Lova Falk|Reflexogenous zones|ts=07:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)}}

Lova Falk talk 07:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reflexogenous zone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oxon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

as you added [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yuri_Leonidovich_Nesterenko&diff=539204323&oldid=539195682 here] (in particular http://www.jillstanek.com/2012/09/washpo-readers-protes-absurd-fact-check-of-obama-infanticide-ad/ ) are not acceptable. That blog itself is not acceptable as a source for a WP:BLP. A user comment certainly is not. Remove it immediately. And all the other crappy "sources" you added as well. -Nathan Johnson (talk) 06:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)