User talk:Sachikosky
{{Talk header}}
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Sachikosky|Sachikosky]] (March 5)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=See the referencing tutorial at WP:INTREFVE.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sachikosky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Sachikosky Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qcne&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sachikosky reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello, Sachikosky!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 13:17, 5 March 2025 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC
[[WP:AfC|AfC]] notification: [[Draft:Sachikosky]] has a new comment
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sachikosky. Thanks! Netherzone (talk) 14:43, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
[[WP:AfC|AfC]] notification: [[Draft:Sachiko Hayashi]] has a new comment
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sachiko Hayashi. Thanks! Star Mississippi 15:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
I've answered your question on my talk page
Hi Sachiko, I have answered your question on my talk page. You will find it here: User talk:Netherzone#Draft:Sachikosky. Netherzone (talk) 16:38, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Sachiko Hayashi|Sachiko Hayashi]] (March 15)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=It's very difficult to write an autobiographic article in a formal, neutral encyclopedic tone.The draft is filled with overly detailed explanations and details similar to an artist statement, promotional wording. As such, it is not ready for main space. Articles should be concise, neutral and cover key events in a person's life, not everything they have ever done. For more information on some of the hazards of writing an autobiography, please take some time and read through WP:AUTOBIO and WP:PROUD for a more comprehensive understanding.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sachiko Hayashi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Sachiko_Hayashi Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Netherzone&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sachiko_Hayashi reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Netherzone (talk) 21:47, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
:@Netherzone, thanks for the comment. I was wondering about the points you raised in your comment. I will go back to the draft and improve it. Thanks. Sachikosky (talk) 04:38, 16 March 2025 (UTC)