User talk:Sackiii

:@Royiswariii Ok I will wait for the release date. Sackiii (talk) 04:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

File:Chocolate chip cookies.jpg

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sackiii! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:58, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

:@Xiphoid Vigour Thanks Sackiii (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

:@Xiphoid Vigour How you take my contributions on Wikipedia. Can you please rate them out of 10 ? Sackiii (talk) 17:03, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

::@Sackiii I can't tell their quality so easily and properly but you have contributed really fast. Your mainspace edits are same as mine! By the way your account is to new to be accepted for the rights. I suggest you withdraw as it won't be accepted. Even I wasn't accepted because of that. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 17:08, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

:::Would you like to fight vandalism? Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 17:08, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

::::@Xiphoid Vigour Sure!! Sackiii (talk) 17:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

::::@Xiphoid Vigour I would like to fight against Vandalism on Wikipedia. Sackiii (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::@Sackiii But, for your information, you should also read WP:SOCK. I'm warning, as all the newcomers that I've seen are vandals or sockpuppeteers. & I don't want you to be 1. Alright? Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 09:41, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

::::::@Xiphoid Vigour Your reply to me is seriously discouraged. If you find that I'm a sock or link with other accounts, you can report to me at WP:ANI or Concerning Sockpuppet Investigations page. Thank you 😊 !!!! Sackiii (talk) 09:55, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::::@Sackiii You're taking the wrong meaning. I'm not saying that you're a sock! I'm just saying you not to be a sock puppeteer! Please don't pounce back like that!!!!!! Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 10:08, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::@Sackiii,You can join WP:CVU. ; ) Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 10:11, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

::::::@Xiphoid Vigour Ok Thanks 👍 Sackiii (talk) 10:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::::@Sackiii,Hope you're not mistaken now. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 10:13, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi, {{U|Sackiii}}! I noticed that you're applying for user rights such as npp & pcp. Well, all of them rejected, as you either didn't read the criteria or didn't take it seriously. Well, you should wait for any user right till your account is about at least one month old. By the way, the ones that you applied for are not that important for you. You should apply for Autopatrolled when you meet the criteria, as it's most suitable for you. Don't apply rights at such a pace. By the way, I'm sorry if you were offended with my advice above. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 17:10, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

:@Xiphoid Vigour Thanks 👍 Sackiii (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

::@Sackiii What are you doing??!! I was advising to wait and instead you applied the right???? You should withdraw as it's obvious it'll be rejected. Read the guidelines first! Why aren't you understanding it!!! Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 17:34, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

:::@Xiphoid Vigour If my request is rejected then i will wait for another application when my account meets the criteria. Sackiii (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

::::@Sackiii why dont you understand Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 17:38, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::@Xiphoid Vigour Sorry for that!!! Sackiii (talk) 17:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Can you please find and add the reference which shows the date of birth you put on this page (Farah Sadia)? CNMall41 (talk) 19:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

:Sorry for the inconvenience. I have added two sources about her Birth date. The website "Hamari Web", maybe can unreliable but "Dispatch News Desk" is a Reliable. Thanks for noticing it. Sackiii (talk) 19:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Dayan title card.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:17, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Aik News. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Gheus (talk) 18:18, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Farah Sadia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Gheus (talk) 18:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

:@Gheus OK. I will try to make the page ready for the main space Sackiii (talk) 18:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Sahar Hashmi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Gheus (talk) 18:50, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Zain Mahmood Chaudhary. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Gheus (talk) 18:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Sahar Hashmi.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Zain Mehmood.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Aik News logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:06, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahar Hashmi, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button File:OOjs UI icon signature-ltr.svg located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:01, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

:@Miminity Thanks for assisting me ! Sackiii (talk) 14:44, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 in Pakistani television. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 18:45, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

{{ivory messagebox|image=File:Wikipedia Checkuser.svg|imagesize=40px|text=Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

}}

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello and I'm worried that what's going on, i am blocked. Don't know what is the reason but on my user page, i see that i was blocked as a Sockpuppet. I really sad for me to see this. Dear @Jpgordon i am not a sock of this user that is listed on my user page. I created account on 14 February 2025 and start editing. I am not a Sockpuppet and i have no connections with any other accounts. I have also different area of Interest as on Cricket and current events related to Pakistan as i created 2025 Darul Uloom Haqqania bombing, Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2025 and many others. I also get help from @Borgenland, and try to make contact @Liz through her talk page but not received response due to her big amount of messages on talk page. I make edits through both Wikipedia mobile app and desktop. If I'm at home i make edits through desktop and if outside i contribute using Wikipedia APP. I was really enjoying to contribute on Wikipedia as you can see my edits time that even i can't sleep without contributions on Wikipedia. If i were as sock so i make contributions to only those pages that the original blocked account was interested, but i contribute on all over the Wikipedia. I make contributions to vandalism edits and Revert them and also report IP's address on the respective area. I have also contribute on new created pages and draftify 3 of them as they was not ready for main space (i am not a new page reviewer). I make more than hundreds of edits to fix bare URLs on many Wikipedia pages, which some i did with the help of WP:Refil and some manually. Do you think that I'm still a sock. One thing i want to add that i make edits through the mobile network provider internet service, so there can be misunderstanding that the my IP address and the blocked account IP address can be same. This can happen. But I'm blocked and it seriously heartfelt 😢 to me. I request you to take again a look and unblock me. Thank you and i hope you will understand my case |decline = Based on technical and behavioural evidence, you are either {{np|StayCalmOnTress}} or you are operating from the same location, editing the same articles, as that user. Yamla (talk) 11:33, 4 March 2025 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|decline=Are you {{np|StayCalmOnTress}}? Also, this does seem written by AI, as Yamla says below. I suggest you post a new unblock request in your own words. PhilKnight (talk) 17:44, 11 March 2025 (UTC)|Hello and I am writing to formally appeal my block for sockpuppetry and to sincerely apologize for any violations of Wikipedia’s policies. I deeply regret my actions and now fully understand how they may have been perceived as disruptive to the community.

Full Disclosure and Explanation:

I would like to clarify and disclose that this account was created as a second account because I had lost access to my original account due to a forgotten password. My first account was User:Knowrz7747. I had no intention of using multiple accounts to deceive, evade policies, or gain an unfair advantage. Unfortunately, I was unaware of the proper process to disclose the ownership of a second account, which resulted in my account being flagged for sockpuppetry.

I now realize that Wikipedia has clear guidelines regarding multiple accounts, and I should have disclosed my situation properly through the appropriate channels, such as by linking my accounts on my user page or by reaching out to administrators for guidance. My failure to do so was an honest mistake due to a lack of understanding rather than an attempt to violate Wikipedia's policies.

Acknowledgment of Policy Violation:

I now fully understand the importance of:

✔ Transparency in account usage, as outlined in Wikipedia's multiple account policy.

✔ Proper disclosure procedures when a second account is created for legitimate reasons.

✔ How sockpuppetry affects community trust, and why strict enforcement of this policy is necessary.

While my actions were not malicious, I recognize that they went against the principles of Wikipedia’s editing community. I take full responsibility and will ensure this does not happen again.

Commitment to Policy Compliance:

If given another chance, I promise to:

✔ Abide by Wikipedia’s policies and only use a single account going forward.

✔ Properly disclose any future account-related issues using the correct Wikipedia channels.

✔ Contribute constructively and focus solely on improving Wikipedia’s content in good faith.

I kindly request reconsideration of my block, as my actions were not intended to be deceptive. I would appreciate guidance on how to properly handle account disclosure in the future to prevent similar misunderstandings. If necessary, I am willing to abide by any conditions imposed upon unblocking, such as a temporary restriction on account use or a requirement to link my accounts properly.

I genuinely value Wikipedia as a free knowledge platform and wish to return as a constructive contributor. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

User:Sackiii

}} Sackiii (talk) 15:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

According to gptzero.me, there's a 98% certainty this unblock request was generated by an AI. The reviewing admin should take this into account. --Yamla (talk) 15:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear @PhilKnight, I understand that my previous unblock request was declined because it was suspected to be AI-generated. I want to clarify that while I sought guidance on how to structure my request, my situation is real, and I genuinely want to appeal in good faith. I have no connections with the account "Stay Calm on Trees". Also i have different area of interest in Current related articles. I created 2025 Darul Uloom Haqqania bombing, which was current event that time. Also created Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2025, a major and notable article. My first account was"Knowrz7747". I was blocked for sockpuppetry because I created a second account after forgetting the password of my first account. At the time, I didn’t know the proper way to disclose this, and I now realize I should have informed Wikipedia administrators properly. I apologize for any confusion this caused. I had no intention of evading policies or misusing multiple accounts. If unblocked, I will strictly follow Wikipedia’s guidelines. I request reconsideration of my block and guidance on the proper way to proceed. Thank you |decline = Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, {{emu|or}}
• the block is no longer necessary because you
• #understand what you have been blocked for,
• #will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
• #will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)}}

• Note to reviewing admin: Unless [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liz&curid=40068232&diff=1280767893&oldid=1280767029 this] is a joe job, this user has admitted to creating another account to bypass this block. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:08, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

:: You share an IP address with {{np|Opnicarter}} and {{np|Aizaz TA}} who are socks of {{np|Stay Calm on Trees}}. Your explanation does not outweigh the technical and behavioral evidence. PhilKnight (talk) 18:06, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

:::@PhilKnight IP address of the accounts can be the same as I'm from Pakistan and using my Mobile Sim Data Internet. I am currently using Zong (mobile network), a mobile internet provider. IP addresses can be the same as the blocked accounts (which you mentioned) maybe are from Pakistan, as I'm also From Pakistan. When i created an account i was using this network for contributions on Wikipedia. My edits you can see are conservative and didn't spread the mess on Wikipedia. All my contributions are helpful and according to Wikipedia. I think there is no good reason to keep me blocked. I have explained the IP issue for my account and there are no more words to say. Thank you Sackiii (talk) 18:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

::::{{strike|@Sackiii If you really aren't a sockpuppet & want to contribute to Wikipedia and are willing, you'll have to gain trust of Wikimedia Community. So, you'll have to wait. Till, then you can contribute on Urdu Wikipedia & Punjabi Wikipedia. You also contribute to other projects. But be careful and honest. You should have already disclosed all other accounts. If you contribute there, disclose them there too. User:Xiphoid Vigour ||⚔|⚔|| 13:59, 13 March 2025 (UTC)}}

:::::@PhilKnight, @Yamla and @Xiphoid Vigour I have disclosed that I'm using Wikipedia with my second account. In Wikipedia many accounts are allowed but not for illegitimate use. This is my second account after i forgot the password of my first account. There is no bad faith in my edits. I think, i need a chance to prove myself. Thank you Sackiii (talk) 15:20, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

:::{{strike|{{Ping|PhilKnight}} Well, I personally think that {{user|Sackiii}}, may be telling truth. He/She may be living with or near the sockpuppeteer. I haven't found anything badfaith in their editing. Even if this is a sockpuppet he should have abused the policies, but I didn't find any violation. Though I'm associated with him & you may think that I may be taking his side, but I think he should have 1 chance to prove himself. User:Xiphoid Vigour ||⚔|⚔|| 11:11, 12 March 2025 (UTC)}}

:::@PhilKnight @PhilKnight Can you please look at my Unblock Request Review. Thanks Sackiii (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

::::: Admins usually review just 1 unblock request. Having reviewed an unblock request, I will leave the open 1 for an uninvolved admin. PhilKnight (talk) 18:41, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

::::::For those of use who have dealt with the SCOT accounts, would be highly opposed to unblocking this account. Its funny how a newly created account is now defending user. Outside of the confirmed IP connection, the behavioral evidence is spot on. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:11, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

:::::::@CNMall41 I've withdrawn it now. I'm convinced that it's sock thanks to the mistake he did in the reply to my defence.{{tq|This is my second account after ...}} Here, he said that it was his second. According to the requests above this should be the third. So, I've realised my mistake. I'll be more careful from later. Regards, User:Xiphoid Vigour ||⚔|⚔|| 14:56, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

::::::::Also, why would he use LLM to request serious things like unblock. So I've realised my mistake User:Xiphoid Vigour ||⚔|⚔|| 15:01, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::Let me just reiterate that it is highly suspicious that an account created in January of this year is aware of SPIs, aware of this user, and attempted to defend them on that users talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:17, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Noting that I have closed the appeal by the same editor that was on User talk:Nida Con 47 and revoked TPA. -- asilvering (talk) 22:50, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Kana Yaari.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Agar Tum Sath Ho.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Sahar Hashmi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Not even close. Most are unbylind churnalism pieces. The DOB isn't even verified from that source. .

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 17:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Ishq Di Chashni.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 28 April 2025 (UTC)