User talk:Sakura emad
{{DISPLAYTITLE:User talk:{{font color|#f207cb|Sakura emad}}}}
{{Wikipedia ads|ad=7}}
{{Wikipedia ads|ad=193}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(15d)
| archive = User talk:Sakura emad/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 4
| maxarchivesize = 150K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 2
| minthreadsleft = 1
}}{{Talk header|search=yes|arpol=no|wp=no|disclaimer=no|bottom=no|force=true}}{{dashboard.wikiedu.org talk course link | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Tennessee,_Knoxville/Women_in_the_Atlantic_World_(Fall_2021) | slug = University_of_Tennessee,_Knoxville/Women_in_the_Atlantic_World_(Fall_2021) }}
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
File:TWA guide left bottom.png
:::::Hi Sakura emad! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
::::::* The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
::::::* The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
::::::* The Teahouse new editor help space
::::::* Wikipedia Help pages
-- 22:16, Thursday, February 16, 2023 (UTC)
{{Wikipedia:TWA/Navigation2}}
[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Dongmong Seonseup]]
The article :Dongmong Seonseup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not enough in-depth sourcing to pass WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 18:42, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
:@Onel5969 It's backed by the Encyclopedia of Korean Culture (Academy of Korean Studies). How is the source not considered in-depth? We're talking about a 500-year-old book, not some modern publication that can be casually googled. Accessing sources for this topic requires academic research. When the article was created, it took a significant amount of effort just to obtain the Academy of Korean Studies source. ββ πΈ Sakura emad π (talk) 18:53, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
:Just added Multiple sources from solid peer-reviewed journal articles and scholarly studies from independent researchers. I hope that directly satisfies the WP:GNG requirement for "significant coverage in reliable, independent sources." ββ πΈ Sakura emad π (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
::I've de-PRODed it, but you can also WP:DEPROD the article yourself. βCountHacker (talk) 22:06, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
:::CountHacker, Thank you! i just didn't want to interfere in the deletion process. ββ πΈ Sakura emad π (talk) 22:08, 24 April 2025 (UTC)