User talk:Sayurasem

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pindang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian languages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nasi ulam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Betawi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg Your recent editing history at :Curry Mee shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}Note that the same warning has been posted on User talk:Haleth, please take the discussion to the talkpage of Curry Mee instead of over edit summaries. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

I see you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hokkien_mee&type=revision&diff=1108698363&oldid=1108663871 reverted] some extensive edits by me with the tag "vandalism"? I eat a lot of this stuff and did my best to use sources, but if you disagree with the changes, please tag the individual points or discuss on Talk. Jpatokal (talk) 12:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Le Minerale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Davidelit (Talk) 14:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello. What is your exact problem that makes you keep reverting figure placement in the Batik page? I already explained the reason "putting multiple pictures of variable size beside the text ruins the text blocks in web view. Rearranged so that only one is beside text block" in the change log. Did _you_ read the paragraph? The paragraph only mention Prajnaparamita, so that prajnaparamita image is kept while mahakala statue is put in the above gallery is not against the paragraph content. Alteaven (talk) 09:45, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

:In my opinion, the placement of the image is still tolerable and does not interfere with the text.

As I have said, the placement of the image is not quite right, the one in the gallery is an example of the tradition of resist dyeing using wax from various countries, while the content of the paragraph is about batik. Sayurasem (talk) 18:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

:Firstly, it does interfere with other portion of text block and images on web view. Second, resist dyeing using wax IS batik. You seem to be making petty dictions between the terms. But fine whatever, have it your way for the pictures. But please consider WP:NPOV when editing the page, and instead of making the page increasingly unbalanced toward Indonesia centric POV (risking revoke of good article status), improve the Batik in Indonesia page. Alteaven (talk) 10:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

::But please consider WP:NPOV when editing the page, and instead of making the page increasingly unbalanced toward Indonesia centric POV (risking revoke of good article status)

::I didn’t even change any text. Sayurasem (talk) 12:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I saw you reverted to a version of Tempeh that does not include my typo correction from Aspergiluus flavus to Aspergillus flavus. I assume you wanted to revert another change and my edit got caught in the crossfire. Is this correct? I didn't want to change it back without asking you out of respect to your revert. If you instead do consider Aspergiluus flavus to be the correct spelling, please let me know why you consider it the correct spelling, despite it's wikipage Aspergillus flavus, it being spelled that way in lexicons https://flexikon.doccheck.com/de/Aspergillus_flavus and on other scientific pages https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/aspergillus-flavus . Again, I think you meant to change another edit and this got caught in the crossfire Kriseck (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on :Bakpia- requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Bakpia-|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pollia (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Sayurasem. About the rendang page, I only added templates for references that needed their own pages. I have no idea what argument you have with MrCattttt from February → last week because a lot of edits have been made there so far ahead that I cannot keep up easily. Pick just MrCattttt's edits and not mine; leave me out, please, because it is dizzying me. Mat Kiyan (talk) 07:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

With all due respect, I kindly ask that you refrain from reverting the content and instead engage in the discussion on the Rendang's talk page. This will allow us to address any concerns collaboratively and in a civil manner, working together to reach a consensus on the most accurate and neutral presentation of the information. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. --Native99girl (talk) 09:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Audit2020 (talk) 03:21, 17 March 2025 (UTC)