User talk:Schnapper

File:Farm-Fresh eye.png You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Next match day scenarios. {{#if:|{{{more}}}}} Jack Bornholm (talk) 21:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

What did you do to the AFC U22 Championship? Druryfire (talk) 11:59, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

:I checked this page a couple of hours ago, but it was already moved to this page which didn't have any content in it. So I managed to fill the main section as you can currently see, but I couldn't fill the qualification page as the content was nowhere to find. Schnapper (talk) 12:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Peacedove.svg

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group stage". Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 00:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

{{clear}}

Hi. I just wanted to inform you that the way you're formatting the 2012 CECAFA Cup group stage tables in unproductive. Putting borders on the tables would be more confusing to understand and more complicated to explain. Many other group tables on Wikipedia are color-coded in the background instead of having borders, e.g. 2012–13 UEFA Champions League, 2012 CAF Champions League, 2012–13 CONCACAF Champions League, 2012 Copa Libertadores, 2012 AFC Champions League, UEFA Euro 2012, 2012 Africa Cup of Nations, the list could go on forever. Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 16:30, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

:For your information, color-coded background are only reserved for teams that have already qualified or been eliminated, while the borders are used everywhere. This is the standard Wikipedia uses for all the pages you mentioned (and the list can go forever). And your way is really more confusing. For example, in Group B, neither team is qualified or eliminated, yet Somalia (0 pt) is in red and Burundi (6 pts) in green: Some people will easily think that this is the case. So I'll keep using the standards for the CECAFA Cup rankings. --Schnapper (talk) 16:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

:Ah, I see. Sorry for disturbing you. Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 17:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

::You're welcome. I was wrong however, Burundi is actually already qualified as one of the best 2 runners-up at least. --Schnapper (talk) 17:18, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

:::By the way, Somalia's definitely eliminated from the tournament. They have no points and a goal difference of -5. Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 18:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

::::Nope, they aren't. If they and Burundi win, Somalia will be equal on points with Tanzania and Sudan. In this case, the direct matches will count. If Burundi defeat Sudan and Somalia win by one goal, they will be 3rd, 2nd if they win by more goals.--Schnapper (talk) 19:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

:::::Actually, South Sudan aren't out either; if they beat Uganda by more than three goals and Ethiopia lose to Kenya (or Kenya lose by more than two goals), they can climb to third place. Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 07:36, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

::::::False. South Sudan lost to both Kenya and Ethiopia. Therefore they can't reach 3rd place because of head-to-head results.--Schnapper (talk) 08:15, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

::::::Look. South Sudan can only go ouy if Ethiopia and Kenya draw. If Ethiopia or Kenya lose and South Sudan beat Uganda by a bigger goal margin than the Kenya-Ethiopia game, they'll get to third place, e.g. Ethiopia have a goal difference of 0 with 3 points. If they lose 2-0 to Kenya and South Sudan beat Uganda 3-0, Ethiopia will go down to -2 and South Sudan up to 3 points with a GD of 0. Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 12:56, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

:::::::Global goal difference does not prevail, head-to-head results do. See the tie-breaking rules. --Schnapper (talk) 13:04, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group G standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 01:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg Your recent editing history at :2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Second Round shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Stigni (talk) 15:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

::For your information, I'm not undoing any another editor's work. I'm not the one to blame here. Schnapper (talk) 15:13, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

:::Stop Edit war both of you. And before re-add it, please discuss on the talk page... Because I really think that the consens agree with Dr. Vicodine. Stigni (talk) 15:23, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Can you add the tiebraking criteria to that page? Stigni (talk) 08:53, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi

Just wanted to say sorry for undoing your change. It was an honest mistake.I went after the standings at UEFA.com and really thought they would be correct, but i totally understand the tiebreaking criteria now that you told me about them in edit summary. Sorry. QED237 (talk) 18:37, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) UEFA often contradict themselves with their tie-breaking rules when establishing rankings. Schnapper (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573892941 your edit] to 2014 UEFA European Under-19 Championship qualification may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:2014 UEFA European Under-19 Championship qualification|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].

{{{!}} class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; margin-top: 0.2em;" {{!}}-

! style="background-color: #FAA;" {{!}}

{{!}}-

{{!}} style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; " {{!}}

{{!}}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I saw you incorrectly removed eliminated color for Dinamo Zagreb on 2013–14 UEFA Europa League. You can for example see that they are eliminated [http://www.uefa.com/uefaeuropaleague/season=2014/matches/round=2000469/match=2012551/postmatch/report/index.html here]. Even if they could possibly get tied on points, they will lose on the tiebreaking procedure (matches amongst teams in question). QED237 (talk) 16:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! I invite you to a new discussion on the matter: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Next matchday scenarios. Ivan Volodin (talk) 17:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

: Hi. Sorry for disturbing you again. Thank you for participating in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Next matchday scenarios and for your support. I have proposed a conclusion that addresses the concerns of many participants regarding reliable sources. Would appreciate a comment. Ivan Volodin (talk) 10:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

What about just putting the league number beside the group fixtures instead of in the table? I think having the numbers in the tables would confuse the reader more than clarifying league. What do you think about that? --Reckless182 (talk) 10:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Swiss Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi, may I ask why you totally ignored the comment in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2015_UEFA_Women%27s_Under-17_Championship_qualification&diff=655984210&oldid=655966632 this edit]? Timestamp must be updated, this time it said no match had been played after your edit. I will assume good faith at this time, but it has happened before and I dont want it to happen again or it might even be considered disruptive if it happens on a regular basis. QED237 (talk) 22:31, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

:I'm human and therefore may forget to update the timestamp since this is a new thing. And when somebody forgets it, since this can only be an oversight, can you please just update the timestamp instead of undoing the edit (less time-wasting and less frustrating)? Schnapper (talk) 08:24, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

::Seems like you need a second reminder after forgetting it at :Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group D. As soon as you update any kind of stats, timestamp should be updated. Qed237 (talk) 12:39, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

:::What would I do without you..? Schnapper (talk) 13:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Can you help creating other seasons of Swiss Cup, not just the current one. Thanks.Alexiulian25 (talk) 09:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Can you help creating other seasons of Liechtenstein Football Cup ? --Alexiulian25 (talk) 09:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Davis Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey, please update the date when updating tables, thanks. Else people add the same result again... Kante4 (talk) 14:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Can you tell me why you refuse AFC source [http://www.the-afc.com/afcasfeeds?view=standings&id=393&tMode=H&noMenu=yes]? Hazel (talk) 22:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

:They don't respect their own tie breakers, which should be used for Wikipedia. Schnapper (talk) 22:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Davis Cup Africa Zone Group III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohamed Hassan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm 333-blue. I noticed that you made a change to an article, :2017 AFC Cup, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 333-blue 11:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

:It is not sourced and how about a trip to the WP:ANI? 333-blue 12:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Schnapper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Schnapper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Schnapper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF First Round, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belle Vue ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2022_FIFA_World_Cup_qualification_%E2%80%93_CAF_First_Round check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2022_FIFA_World_Cup_qualification_%E2%80%93_CAF_First_Round?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Should Hong Kong be on position 1, given how Cambodia has a better disciplinary record?--Anbans 585 (talk) 20:21, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

My bad. Cambodia has 2 yellows, Bahrain and Hong Kong 3 each, Iraq 4. Schnapper (talk) 20:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Cheers!!--Anbans 585 (talk) 20:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)