User talk:Secretchamberman

25px Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits{{#if:Wizards of Waverly Place|, such as the one you made to :Wizards of Waverly Place,}} did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kubigula (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

25px Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, {{#if:Wizards of Waverly Place|as you did to :Wizards of Waverly Place,}} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}} NrDg 23:43, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

30px This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizards_of_Waverly_Place?diff=308214292 this edit] to :Wizards of Waverly Place. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 00:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg {{#if:24 hours|You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours|You have been temporarily blocked from editing}} in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for {{#if:|reason|abuse of editing privileges}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. {{#if:-- Alexf^(talk) 00:37, 16 August 2009 (UTC)|Alexf^(talk) 00:37, 16 August 2009 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|1=The edits I made were factual and not vandalism. I obtained the information from the newspapers mentioned and by speaking with the CEO of the Rodriguez Film Foundation, Timothy Rodriguez|decline=Some of the claims in the edits were patently false. Unless you can provide links to the reviews—and USA Today reviews should be searchable online—I agree with the assessment of vandalism. —C.Fred (talk) 01:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)}}| I have searched all of the websites of the newspapers mentioned and neither of them have searchable reviews of ANYTHING. I saw the "USA Today" review in the March 10, 2009 issue, page 9E, and the "New York Times" review in the April 22, 2009 issue, page 13H. The CEO of the Rodriguez Film Foundation can be reached at 212-580-0813, please call him, tell him the SecretChamberMan sent you, tell him your full name, and ask him to read you the Wizards of Waverly Place review. I hope that this information is enough to clear my name, and allow me to continue to contribute more wholly factual information. -Secretchamberman ([User_talk:Secretchamberman|talk]]) 22:24, 15 August 2009 (UTC-5)}}

30px This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia{{#if:Wizards of Waverly Place|, as you did to :Wizards of Waverly Place}}, you will be blocked from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}} See WP:FAKE - yes I did check. NrDg 22:44, 21 August 2009 (UTC)