User talk:Sedej

+

{{unblock reviewed|reason=I have to right edit again an article after one or two day. I was gived an reasons on my edits. Admin blocked me with without reason. I did not break 3RR rule either any rules. I revert just one time. Look my contributions, I'm not an vandal. Sedej (talk) 14:34, 31 March 2016 (UTC)|decline=Your limited skill in the use of English makes understanding your request difficult. But you are not blocked for violating the 3-revert rule; you are blocked for edit warring, which is clearly stated in the block template. In any further request you must address this point. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)}}

Note to admins reviewing unblock requests - There was additional edit warring at :Category:Kurdish terrorism, including replacing an invalid deletion tag (tagged as an empty category when it wasn't empty). UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 14:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note to reviewing admins, I strongly suspect user {{user|Sedej}} is same person as {{user|Kordestani}} using another username , re-adding exactly same edits reverted for user Kordestani, {{user|Enxip}} (Enxip same person as Kordestani). See for example [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kurdi&action=history here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Syrian_Civil_War_infobox&action=history here]. Spirit Ethanol (talk) 14:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox

|Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sedej, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.{{#if:| Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)}}

|File:Puppeter template.svg

}} Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox

|Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sedej, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.{{#if:| Dr. K. 17:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC)}}

|File:Puppeter template.svg

}} Dr. K. 17:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox

|Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sedej, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.{{#if:| Baking Soda (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)}}

|File:Puppeter template.svg

}} Baking Soda (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Sedej. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}