User talk:Shruti Malaker

March 2018

A Wikipedia talk page is for messages and discussions about work for the encyclopaedia: it is not a place to post a personal web page, unrelated to work for Wikipedia. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

References

Please add WP:INLINECITED references to Chandrima Shaha; this is a requirement for biographies of living people. Thanks for your hard work, Boleyn (talk) 13:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

:Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 05:14, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Chandrima Shaha

Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. Shruti Malaker, thanks for creating Chandrima Shaha!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. see WP:referencing for beginners to see how to add in-line footnotes. Then we know what reference support which statement.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:29, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Boleyn Sir,

Thank you for your message.

I tried a lot to edit References "Inline Citation", but unable to get it. Please tell me how to do it.

Shruti.

Hi, Shruti. Have a look at WP:referencing for beginners and WP:INLINECITE, but if you find them difficult to understand, there's always help if you post at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Essentially you add a piece of information (e.g. 'He was born in Paris') and then after the statement you add the source you got it from, e.g. Famous Parisians by Joe Bloggs, p.2. You wouldn't have the space between ref and >, I added that so it doesn't add a reference to this page! Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 05:42, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

style="margin: 1em 4em;"
valign="top"

| File:WP teahouse logo 2.png

|

Hi Shruti Malaker! You created a thread called {{tq|Help - In references no. 4 & 13}} at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Teahouse&action=edit§ion=new&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Follow-up to Help - In references no. 4 & 13}} create a new thread].

Archival by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, notification delivery by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{tlx|nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve

The Research interests section has no refs. Remove all the science detail. Add a few sentences with references to her contributions. David notMD (talk) 13:30, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

:Hello Sir,

:Thank you so much. @David notMD Shruti Malaker (talk) 04:46, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

style="margin: 1em 4em;"
valign="top"

| File:WP teahouse logo 2.png

|

Hi Shruti Malaker! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, {{tq|Help Please}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Help Please}}.

See also the help page about the archival process.

The archival was done by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

:Hello Sir,

:Thank you so much.@Muninnbot Shruti Malaker (talk) 04:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)