User talk:Sideshow Bob Roberts
{{not around|3=13 September 2009}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|algo = old(14d)
|archive = User talk:Sideshow Bob Roberts/Archive
}}
Hello, you became so heated last time we worked together that I took a break to give you the opportunity to calm down. I've been working on some articles today and expect that you will have comments. This time may we work together collegially and productively? Our past collaborations have improved several articles and we may continue to do this together. So, let me know which, if any edits may be issues for you. Raggz (talk) 06:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
:Hello again Sideshow
:I've about finished my comments in the discussion that you started. I'm still committed to working with you, if you can manage this. All the best, Raggz (talk) 09:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
::Wikipedia:Rouge admin You should check this site. All the best, Raggz (talk) 00:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
:::You asked the Administrators questions, perhaps the answer is at Five pillars, you might review it. "Wikipedia does not have firm rules besides the five general principles presented here. Be bold in editing, moving, and modifying articles. Although it should be aimed for, perfection is not required. Do not worry about messing up. All prior versions of articles are kept, so there is no way that you can accidentally damage Wikipedia or irretrievably destroy content. Remember — whatever you write here will be preserved for posterity." All the best Raggz (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
1860 Oxford evolution debate
| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk" |
| Image:Updated DYK query.svg
|On 18 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with {{#if:|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:|s |
}}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} {{{5}}}
}}{{#if:|, and {{{6}}}}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
re Ombudsman ban - lift for now
Hi, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ANotice_board_for_vaccine-related_topics&diff=197095009&oldid=192894414 this edit] that you commented upon to Ombudsman, irrespective of a ban or not, was constructive. IMHO, I would not have commented upon that edit and such personal engagement was perhaps less than wise given the animosity between him and the likes of you or I. He has made other constructive edits to the page before, and although did edit war and rephrase material pertaining to himself, on balance I think it reasonable to allow him to continue further constructive edits. I've therefore lifted the ban (in process of my writting & submitting this, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AOmbudsman&diff=199754806&oldid=199746838 he had written] an unpleasant attack piece - oh well). But whatever his grievence against the ArbCom, he is and remains de facto on probation. That said, that does not warrent any goading, and indeed he would be right to complain if that were to occur; so if you have any future concerns then seek admin action and probably best for the openess at WP:AN/I. David Ruben Talk 04:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
GAR reassessment of [[International Criminal Court]]
Hi, if you are still active this is just to let you know that the ICC article is being reassessed at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/International Criminal Court/1. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
[[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]]
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of [[:Template:ICC summary table]]
File:Ambox warning blue.svg:Template:ICC summary table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
