User talk:Silver seren#NLT clarification
{{User:Silver seren/Userpageheader}}
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}
{{archives|search=yes}}
Well...here's my talk page. If anyone has questions about an edit I did, please put it here.
--Silver seren 14:37, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 70K
|counter = 33
|minthreadsleft = 2
|minthreadstoarchive = 5
|algo = old(14d)
|archive = User talk:Silver seren/Archive %(counter)d
}}
Please cease and strike personal attacks/aspersions
I don't like templating so I won't. Calling people "fringe-promoting editors" is a personal attack, saying that they're acting disruptively based on this is an aspersion.
You've done it here and here, both times I was amongst the people you were characterising. I think you should retract. Samuelshraga (talk) 20:16, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
:No, it's not. It's a comment on editing activity, which inherently is not a personal attack. Fringe promotion is a statement about edits and statements made on-wiki and the activity of the account in question. SilverserenC 20:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of [[:Sambalut]] for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sambalut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Featured article review for J. K. Rowling
User:Adam Cuerden has nominated J. K. Rowling for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Arbcom case you may be interested in
Apologies I somehow missed to list you in my original list of parties, but believe you may want to be based on your history in the area.
Please see below notice and feel free to add a statement:
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Transgender health care misinformation on Wikipedia and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, Raladic (talk) 05:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
:Hi {{u|Silver seren}}, I have added you to the huge proposed parties list because {{u|Snokalok}} (and {{u|Raladic}} above) suggested doing so. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:01, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
[[Edible Communities]]
Hi Silver, can you take a look at Edible Communities? Looks to me to meet notability requirements. Thriley (talk) 23:29, 16 June 2025 (UTC)