User talk:SirJohnDeAssbergers

File:Information.svg Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to :Giotto has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

I find it less constructive not to accredit Sir John, when such adequate proof is presented.

{{unblock reviewed | 1=Would like to create user page | decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
• #understand what you have been blocked for,
• #will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
• #will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 12:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}} SirJohnDeAssbergers (talk) 12:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I understand that I vandalized a page with non-constructive information. I reviewed the vandalism policies. I assure you I will not violate any policy rules in the near future, if my block were to be lifted. | decline = We don't care only about the near future. Yamla (talk) 14:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)}}