User talk:Spinifex&Sand
Spinifex&Sand, you are invited to the Teahouse!
style="margin: 1em 4em;" |
valign="top"
| Hi Spinifex&Sand! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation
Paul Elvstrom
My bad. Was not my intention. Must have pushed the wrong buttons. I realy liked your additions. I only wanted to remove an extra Bert and an redundant birthday. Sorry for the inconviniance.
Dragon Genoa (talk) 09:14, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying Dragon Genoa, no worries. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 05:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grampians National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arapiles. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page :Guillaume Brahimi, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
- Copying text from other sources
- Policy on copyright
- Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
- Policy and guideline on non-free content
If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can {{edit|Special:MyTalk|click here to ask a question on your talk page|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}} and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Jack Earl (Australian sailor)]] has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Jack_Earl_(Australian_sailor) help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
:Thanks Caleb. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 03:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
File:Control copyright icon.svg Hello Spinifex&Sand! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.{{#ifeq: | 1 |}}
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.{{#ifeq: | 2 |}}
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 06:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Important note: I see you have been previously warned about respecting copyrights, but again have copied text. You must write using your own words. -- Whpq (talk) 01:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- :I am still relatively new to this, and do appreciate your help and guidance. I have redrafted the page on Agnes Smith and resubmitted for review. ~~ Spinifex&Sand (talk) 04:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
:Thank you asilvering. I am still a relatively new editor, but do want to create good content and so your feedback is appreciated. Thank you for your feedback. I have resubmitted the Agnes Smith page for review. ~~ Spinifex&Sand (talk) 04:18, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Draft:Agnes Clifford Smith]]
{{Quote box|quote=
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
|width=20%|align=right}}A tag has been placed on :Draft:Agnes Clifford Smith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jstor.org/stable/community.28046921
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. asilvering (talk) 06:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Agnes Clifford Smith|Agnes Clifford Smith]] (July 25)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agnes Clifford Smith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Agnes_Clifford_Smith Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dusti&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Agnes_Clifford_Smith reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Dusti*Let's talk!* 15:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Agnes Smith (author)|Agnes Smith (author)]] (August 16)
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=See the notability guideline on creative professionals. I have a soft spot for West Virginia, but I don't think she quite clears the notability guideline. One book that won a few lower-tier awards and only one source that specifically covers the author is not enough.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agnes Smith (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Agnes_Smith_(author) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AviationFreak&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Agnes_Smith_(author) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AviationFreak💬 05:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
:Thanks AviationFreak, that is constructive feedback. I will see what else I can find. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 06:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, [[Draft:Agnes Clifford Smith]]
Hello, Spinifex&Sand. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Agnes Clifford Smith".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3AAgnes+Clifford+Smith request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 03:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, [[Draft:Agnes Smith (author)]]
Hello, Spinifex&Sand. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Agnes Smith".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3AAgnes+Smith+%28author%29 request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Jeremy Griffith court case
I see you recently edited [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Griffith#World_Transformation_Movement| this section] on the Jeremy Griffith page, about the court case. In case you are not aware, that section was the subject of several lengthy discussions on the Talk pages. Your edits look OK to me (they have certainly made the content easier to understand) but I wanted to let you know it’s probably best to exercise caution when editing any discussion of legal proceedings, especially on a page where a lot of editors have had discussions about how best to present the content. And of course to be mindful of WP:BLP. Cabrils (talk) 00:23, 14 March 2025 (UTC)