User talk:Spleodrach

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|maxarchivesize = 150K

|counter = 9

|minthreadsleft = 5

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(21d)

|archive = User talk:Spleodrach/Archive/Archive %(counter)03d

}}

{{archive box|search=no|

}}

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brendan_Daly_(politician)&oldid=1103707217

Why was this reference removed? It is factually correct. Suganscribe (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Structure image on the Oireachtas and Seanad pages

The images you keep reverting back to is supposed to be for the results section of the 2024 Irish general election page and the 2025 Seanad election page. These show the parties on a left-right spectrum, not the actual composition and structure of the Dáil and Seanad. These shouldn't be used on the Dáil and Seanad pages because thats not what they actually show. The Government sits to the left of the Ceann Comhairle, and the Opposition sits on the right. The seats on the government benches are not random. I have gone through the chamber seating plan and each one corresponds to an actual seat of a TD or Senator. The ones that rapidly shift between the two parties are the front bench cabinet of the government. This is the source: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/parliamentaryBusiness/other/2025-02-11_dail-chamber-seating-plan-11-february-2025_en.pdf Lough Swilly (talk) 17:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

:There are also flaws with using those files because Eoin Hayes TD and Senator Martin Conway are not shown as Independents but as sitting with the Social Democrats and Fine Gael, respectively. The Ceann Comhairle and the Cathaoirleach are also shown as being part of the Independents and Fianna Fáil even though they have taken up their posts as head and chair of the Dáil and Seanad. Lough Swilly (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

::To use an Oireachtas term, and as a "point of order", this discussion (which is about an article's content) should be occurring on the talk page for that article. At Talk:Oireachtas. Where other contributors to that article can see it. Not here. Where almost nobody will find it. (Not everyone will see the "hidden" user talk link that I happened upon in an edit summary.) Guliolopez (talk) 20:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

:::@Guliolopez I do apologise. I should have brought it up on the talk page. I only tried to bring it up with Spleodrach here since they seemed to take issue with my edits. Lough Swilly (talk) 20:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

a question about Biography

Hello, I hope you're doing well.

I have an article that I would like you to review and make the necessary edits to, and to move it to the main space if you have time to review it and if it meets the notability criteria for biographies. Thank you! Editoromar9 (talk) 11:56, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hi, I'm not familiar with this person, so I will politely decline. Spleodrach (talk) 12:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

::Sorry for any inconvenience with many thanks Editoromar9 (talk) 12:08, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eur.it.010.gif

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Eur.it.010.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)