User talk:Stormm001

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center{{snd}}need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Sandbox|action=edit}} do so].
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Shearonink (talk) 18:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

FYI - Infoboxes are supposed to summarize important information that appears in the main text. Your edits added information that only appears in the infobox, this is against WP:MOS, see Help:Infobox#What should an infobox contain? for more info. Also, all the supposed details as the information had appeared in the infobox was unsourced. All that can be stated in the infobox is what appears in the cited sources, that 4 different weapons were used or fired during this spree killings events. The perpetrator used 3 of them and one of the dead victims used the 4th. The gun info as it appeared in the cited sources is now present in the main text - Shearonink (talk) 20:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2017 Mississippi shootings § Recent edits. Shearonink (talk) 21:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to CZ 457. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Josey Wales ^Parley 22:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

:The reason I decided to create the CZ 457 Wikipedia page was because no one else did it yet & I could only find a Czech language Wikipedia page for this .22 rifle despite it being the CZ flagship .22 rifle currently made (https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CZ_457). Make sure you guys do a better job at polishing this page & get it updated. All i did was the rough draft. Make sure you finish the job. Stormm001 (talk) 22:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

::Unfortunately, the onus is on the creator of the article to provide references to reliable sources when publishing the article (see reliable sources), otherwise the article may be deleted or sent to draft. There are about 9,000 new articles waiting to be reviewed for such problems and the reviewers usually dont have the time to spare to make improvements Josey Wales ^Parley 08:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to CZ 457. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 05:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

:I don’t want to improve on it myself anymore. Can you do it on my behalf? Stormm001 (talk) 05:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

When you are adding cites to articles, like you did at Covina massacre with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Covina_massacre&diff=next&oldid=1245799785 this edit], the "access-date" parameter is supposed to be the date you, the editor, access the reference. So it wouldn't be the date of the incident or the date of the cited reference, it would be the date you access the reference, the date you placed the reference in the article. So if you edit the article today, and today is September 30, 2024, that would be the actual access-date. - Shearonink (talk) 16:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Lockheed Martin shooting § What weapon was actually used in the shooting...let us discuss. Shearonink (talk) 04:04, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

I've mentioned this to you before. When you cite a reference, the access date is the date you access the reference, not the date the news article, book, etc was written or published. In the references you have been putting into articles - for instance, recently in Lockheed Martin shooting - you are still stating the published date as your access-date... - Shearonink (talk) 02:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

:Me again. Please make sure you're putting in the date you add the info in a cite as the access date. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 18:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

::One more time.

::access-date in the cite template is the date you, the editor, find the info and you add it to the article, not the date of the event itself and not the date the source was published. - Shearonink (talk) 20:21, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

:::My apologies. I’m new to Wikipedia & still have a lot to learn Stormm001 (talk) 20:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to :2007 SuccessTech Academy shooting, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. ''Faulty referencing...

So far as I can tell, none of the cited sources in this article mention the specific manufacturers & models of the 2 revolvers used in this school shooting. In the sources, the weapons seem to be only id'ed as a .22 revolver & a .38 revolver.

Also, Wikipedia cannot use an editor's expertise as a source. The "Asa Coons" guns photo does not clearly identify the make & model of the 2 revolvers. You might be able to identify them from the photo, I might be able to identify them from the photo but readers have to be able to verify that information in a reliable published source.'' Shearonink (talk) 17:36, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

This is a continuing iasue with your edits. You add specific information to a shooting article's infobox but that information does not exist within the main body of the article. For instance, even though your edits to 2024 Apalachee High School shooting contained reliable sources, you added specific make/model information to the infobox even though that information does not exist within the main article text.

Please take a careful look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes. It states "The purpose of an infobox is to summarize, but not supplant, the key facts that appear in an article. ... an article should remain complete with its infobox ignored. The less information that an infobox contains, the more effectively it serves its purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance."

Adding weapons information to an infobox without integrating that information into the main article text isn't as useful as integrating specific weapons information into the article. Infoboxes are supposed to be a short and succinct summary, the main article text then expands on whatever is presented in the infobox.

I also want you to understand something here...I am trying to help you. I know you are new around here - Wikipedia can be an overwhelming place for a new editor with lots of policies and rules. You are enthusiastic about adding weapons information to infoboxes...consider adding make/model/gauge/manufacturer info from published reliable sources to the actual article instead. - Shearonink (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

To use a picture on Wikipedia, we need permission from whoever owns it/whoever created the image.

• If it is your own picture - you created the image or own the image - then you can just upload it at "Commons", saying "It is entirely my own work" - at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Upload .
• If it is not yours, meaning you did not create it or you do not own the image (maybe it was found somewhere online), then the owner or copyright-holder can give permission in two ways;
• A) They could put it on a website (flickr, or their own site) with an appropriate licence, such as "Public Domain" or "Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike" (that is an option in flickr)
• B) They could email us permission. You could ask them to do that, by sending them an email saying something like "Hi, I've written a page on Wikipedia, and I'd really like to add a picture - but as Wikipedia is FREE, we can only use freely-licensed pictures. If you have any which you can give permission for, please send me an email back with the text below, and the picture(s) attached."

::-Then add a copy of this: http://enwp.org/user:chzz/help/myboilerplate (having filled the form out)

::-And send the email (attached picture file + completed form) to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

::: Shearonink (talk) 21:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2007 SuccessTech Academy shooting § Weapons. Shearonink (talk) 18:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Ruger LC Carbine. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

:Thanks. Let anyone edit on it. Let me know when you’re ready to remove it from the draft stage. Stormm001 (talk) 17:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

:If you or anyone else want to edit some more info into the LC carbine page, be my guest. Let me know when you want to send it for approval. Thanks. Stormm001 (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Ruger LC Carbine. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and because the only source currently in the article is from the manufacturer so it's not independent of the subject.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pichpich (talk) 13:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

:Allow anyone to edit it Stormm001 (talk) 17:04, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

:I submitted my article so others can be allowed to edit it so it can have a better chance of being approved. Stormm001 (talk) 17:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

::The submission process is to flag it as ready for review, it has nothing to do with others being able to edit it. KylieTastic (talk) 17:33, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

:::Where do I go to flag it for review? Stormm001 (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

::::You did submit for review and it was declined. If you want help or advice on it you could try Wikipedia:WikiProject Firearms KylieTastic (talk) 17:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

:I Object. I Do Not Wish For This Page To Be Deleted Without My Consent. Stormm001 (talk) 20:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Cameron Dewe. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of :David Kozák. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The external links you added appear to be catalogues for various firearms manufacturers and are not suitable as citations for the article, as the links are not sufficiently specific to describe the firearms owned or used by Kozák. Adding such links is contrary to the guideline WP:NOELBODY. Interestingly, you also added a citation about the firearms that Kozák owned that would be suitable as an additional citation, rather than the external links you did add, although its title is in Czech, not English, as your initial addition implied. The citation template has the ability to provide a translated title, and language of the original, in addition to the title of a citation, so that a full citation can be supplied. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 12:50, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

{{Edit summary field/OOUI}}

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting {{myprefs|3|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}, and then click the "{{int:saveprefs}}" button.

I first noticed this while reviewing your edits to the article about David Kozák and when I looked at your other contributions I noticed that you often do not provide an edit summary, or if you do it is only the default text. Please try to provide a descriptive edit summary with every edit you make, as it helps other users to understand what changes you are making to articles and why you are making them. If other users do not understand your edits, you may find them being undone, or or even have articles you write or contribute to being deleted.{{sp}} - Cameron Dewe (talk) 13:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 1977 Klamath Falls nightclub shooting. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

:All I did was start off on creating the rough draft. If you or others wish to finish what I started, you don’t have to ask me for permission. I’m surprised this page wasn’t created sooner. Stormm001 (talk) 06:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Trump portrait 2025-2029.png

is it ok to update Danald Trump’s official portrait for 2025? Stormm001 (talk) 19:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Copyright-problem.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on :1984 Autzen Stadium shooting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/aetna-cas-and-sur-888827047. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Peace, G4† (talk, ask questions, dispute a tagging) 17:08, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Can you please use more sources in your articles, and use citations. The 1977 Klamath Falls nightclub shooting article is 15 paragraphs long, and nearly all of it has no citations.

Also, please finish your articles before you publish them. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1984_Autzen_Stadium_shooting&oldid=1275881942 This] should not be on the site other than as a draft. Thank you. Swinub★ 17:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

:@Stormm001, why are you still churning these out? The 1972 Kettle Valley shooting article has one source, and the only citation used is for one of the rifles. Swinub★ 23:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

::Articles are very limited to find & some information is inaccessible to me since I live in Canada, where some informations is “not allowed in your country”.

::I ask if you to find more sources to attach to the paragraphs as you wish. Stormm001 (talk) 02:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

:::I understand, but no one is forcing you to publish these. If you can't find enough sources, then the articles shouldn't be on the website. If there are more sources available, those should be found first, then the information on the page should be given citations, and then the article can be published. I can't be bothered to make a stink about it, but if an article has only one source, it's not considered a notable topic and therefore doesn't belong outside of draftspace. It's not up to other people to fix things that you've struggled with and not wanted to finish but decided to publish anyway. Swinub★ 03:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as :1984 Autzen Stadium shooting. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Directly copies https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/aetna-cas-and-sur-888827047. Peace, G4† (talk, ask questions, dispute a tagging) 17:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm MIDI. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Hungerford massacre, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MIDI (talk) 11:01, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

:10 years ago, I saw this page & the exact information I edited in was the exact information that was listed in the Hungerford massacre Wikipedia page. IDK why that information about the Beretta 92FS is now just listed as just “9mm Beretta”. Stormm001 (talk) 23:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

::We just need a reliable source that can verify the specific model. Paragraph 14 of [https://www.jesip.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Hungerford-Shootings.pdf the Smith Report], which the article cites, lists only "Beretta 9mm Pistol". Until about 2021 (I haven't looked for the specific edit/date) the article did state "Beretta 92FS semi-automatic 9 mm pistol", but this was unsourced. MIDI (talk) 08:11, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

I removed everything uncited from this article, and then only later found that there was a copyright violation. It's unbelievable that you would add unsourced information to a mass shooting article that is (presumably) covered by BLPCRIME by copying from a podcast transcript. I assume this is why the article was very specific in which exact model of gun was used, but unclear on if the shooter's wife is named "Vicky" or "Vicki".

{{ping|MIDI|Fram}} courtesy ping as this seems to be a pattern. REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 17:51, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Stormm001. Thank you for your work on SIG Sauer P322. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Consistent with other products listed in SIG Sauer#Products, this stub has appropriately been marked as such.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Klbrain}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:42, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Stormm001. Thank you for your work on FN 545. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Consistent with others in :Category:FN Herstal firearms.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Klbrain}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 11:22, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Stormm001. Thank you for your work on FN 510. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Consistent with others in :Category:FN Herstal firearms.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Klbrain}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 11:23, 11 May 2025 (UTC)