User talk:Tchaikovskyflowers

Hello, Tchaikovskyflowers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to :Panama Canal. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or {{edit|Special:MyTalk|ask for help on your talk page|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}}, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Altamel (talk) 18:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Image:Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from :Red box (government) into :Despatch box. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from page name; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, Tchaikovskyflowers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Windridge & Young".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Windridge & Young|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:58, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Expulsion of the Albanians, 1877–1878, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muhajir. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Surname, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archaic Period.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to :Radcliffe Line, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:My edits did not include any original research, I purely reformatted the sentences, as I found the section with multiple style issues (lack of capitals, lack of spacing, and outright ungrammatical). I would suggest going and reading the section as it currently stands before reverting edits. Please explain if I have broken any other rules, because I don't see how it constitutes original research. Tchaikovskyflowers (talk) 08:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

:: Thanks for responding. That entire section was unsourced, and it is getting padded by more unsourced content. I have now removed the newly added content, and tagged the old content for citations. Thanks for your work in any case. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)