User talk:Theblako

Thanks for uploading :Image:Brunker.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{tlp|Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user={{PAGENAMEE}}}} this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gamaliel 18:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Theblako,

OK, so lets call time on the edits to this page . . . for now!

I now agree that the page should not be updated until the Celeb Get Me Out etc. has finished and any fall out from the Marc Bannerman situation has settled, or been resolved. You're right, there's no point in adding to the page on a day by day basis.

However, once that point is reached I fully expect to be able to edit the page with accurate information, that is not libelous etc., without being censored by every Tom, Dick and Harry!

Cheers,

Andyfaz99 (talk) 09:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

You are clearly missing the point. A proper reference should be an inline citation, using the citeweb format in this case, not just a web link at the bottom. Please read WP:CITE and edit the reference accordingly. Thanks.--UpDown (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

No problem at all - always happy to help. I will post a welcome message on this page. It has a bunch of useful links. – ukexpat (talk) 14:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

|}

|}

25px It appears that a help desk request you submitted has been answered. Please take a moment a view the reply over there - if this doesn't quite help you, please feel free to ask for more information or clarification. Tiggerjay (talk) 15:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maneuvering the Nocturnal Hum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FamblyCat94 (talk) 14:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)