User talk:Thing User

January 2021

Deleted warnings. --Serols (talk) 17:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

I was not trying to be unconstructive and I thought it was ok because it was in the nonsense/vandalism section Thing User (talk) 15:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Thing User, you are invited to the Teahouse!

style="margin: 1em 4em;"
valign="top"

| File:WP teahouse logo 2.png

|

Hi Thing User! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like {{noping|ChamithN}} (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation

Deleted warning. --Serols (talk) 17:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Its not vandalism. It was a pool that is not meant to be encyclopedic content Thing User (talk) 17:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse|ts=Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)}}

Not vandalism

You're right, it's not vandalism. Hopefully the reverting will stop. You have to admit, it kind of looks like vandalism to those unfamiliar with the page in question. I can understand the mistake.

Anyway, welcome. A gentle reminder: this is primarily an encyclopedia, so you're eventually going to get more legitimate pushback if all you do is spend time on WP:FUN pages. But this was a rougher than necessary introduction. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

:I'm well aware what the page is about but this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Seven-millionth_topic_pool&diff=prev&oldid=1002692424] looks like vandalism whilst this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Seven-millionth_topic_pool&diff=prev&oldid=1002694146] looks fine. 17:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

::I guess my point is that AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...etc is just as reasonable a guess as the other entries in the nonsense/vandalism category. It just looks more like vandalism to an anti-vandalism patroller. I believe it's an uncyclopedia meme. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for sorting this out. Thing User (talk) 18:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

:Hello Thing User, sorry for my warnings, but your edits looks like vandalism. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Its fine Serols I see how it could be seen as vandalism Thing User (talk) 18:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)