User talk:Thomasda
Welcome!
Hello, Thomasda, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (
[[Irwin–Hall distribution]]
Disambiguation link notification for May 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dybdahl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunfish ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Dybdahl check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Dybdahl?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Rasmus Pagh|Rasmus Pagh]] (December 16)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Please indicate how this professor meets WP:NACADEMIC}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rasmus Pagh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rasmus Pagh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rasmus_Pagh Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rasmus_Pagh reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
| style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello, Thomasda!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Rasmus Pagh|Rasmus Pagh]] (April 7)
{{divbox|gray|3=The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rasmus Pagh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rasmus Pagh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rasmus_Pagh Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rasmus_Pagh reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
June 2020
File:Information.svg Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to :Draft:Tensorsketch, from its old location at {{no redirect|User:Thomasda/Tensorsketch}}. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - RichT|C|E-Mail 13:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Tensorsketch]] has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/C percentage}} of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Tensorsketch help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Count Sketch
Hello! I created the article Count Sketch, please check this content and help to improve it. Thank you for your contribution.Swadim (talk) 07:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harmonic mean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concave.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Concern regarding [[Draft:Rasmus Pagh]]
File:Information.svg Hello, Thomasda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rasmus Pagh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. {{#if:||You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.}}
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Polynomial evaluation
Thanks for creating Polynomial evaluation. I have fixed some weaknesses. However, in your more recent edits you have insered again some that have been previously fixed. I mean the systematic use of "we" that is discouraged in Wikipedia. See MOS:WE. Please, fix this yourself.
Also, you could add a section on Khovanskii's theorem relating the additive complexity of the evaluation of a polynomial with the number of its real roots (maybe this is already in your project). D.Lazard (talk) 12:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
: Thanks for the help with the article! The MOS:WE seems to say that "we" is allowed in math like "We construct S as follows". I'll try to be more careful not to overuse it. Khovanskii's theorem sounds very interesting too. I don't know it, but I will make a not to look it up. If you know it well you are also very welcome to add it, or anything else you feel is lacking. My todo mostly include multipoint evaluation and the preparation techniques following Motzkin. Thomasda (talk) 18:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
::{{to|Thomasda}} For the relationship between additive complexity and number of real roots, you can see: Risler, J. J. (1985). Additive complexity and zeros of real polynomials. SIAM Journal on Computing, 14(1), 178-183.
:: The other articles listed by Google Scholar for "additive complexity" polynomial can be useful either. D.Lazard (talk) 19:23, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:Irwin-hall-cdf.png]]
The file :File:Irwin-hall-cdf.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused, superseded by :File:Irwin-hall-cdf.svg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)