User talk:Timlabor

Welcome

Hello {{PAGENAME}} and welcome to Wikipedia! I am {{ucfirst:ukexpat}} and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

{{Wikipedia Embassy link}}

cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="margin:0em 0em 1em 0em; width:100%"

| style="width:45%; vertical-align:top; border:1px solid #fad67d; background-color:#faf6ed;" |

20px Getting Started

20px Getting help

20px The Commmunity

| style="padding:0em 0.5em 0em 0.5em;" |

| style="width:55%; vertical-align:top; border:1px solid #abd5f5; background-color:#f1f5fc;" |

20px Policies and Guidelines

20px Things to do

''Click [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:{{urlencode:{{ucfirst:ukexpat}}}}&action=edit§ion=new here]

to reply to this message.''

ukexpat (talk) 15:44, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Notability

Please don't take [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Timothy_Labor&diff=prev&oldid=401626059 this] personally. You may be quite talented and accomplished at what you do, but that does not make for a Wikipedia article. I'm quite talented and good at what I do, but that doesn't get me an article either. Notability is indicated by verifiable evidence, and the Wikipedia guidelines on it are quite clear. Since you have such a clear conflict of interest regarding this discussion, why not just take a back seat and let other uninvolved editors review the article and make their assessments? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:17, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

{{talkback|Reaper Eternal|Deletion history|ts=01:05, 18 December 2010 (UTC)}}

Nomination of [[Charles Otte]] for deletion

The article Charles Otte is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Otte until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)