User talk:Tinguat

Welcome!

Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions{{#if:|, especially what you did for {{{art}}}|}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on {{#if:|my talk page|my talk page}}, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! IronDuke 17:28, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

3rr

Image:Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war{{#if:Hamas| according to the reverts you have made on :Hamas}}. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}} You should self-revert now to avoid being blocked. Also, could you say what accounts you have used before, if any? Thanks. IronDuke 22:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

:As you ignored my warning and reverted again, I filed a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Tinguat_reported_by_User:IronDuke_.28Result:_.29 report]. IronDuke 02:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg You have been blocked from editing for {{#if:24 hours|a period of 24 hours|a short time}} in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule{{#if:| at :{{{1}}}}}. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. {{#if:true|Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 03:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|1=I didn't violate the three-revert rule. Please review evidence before blocking.|decline=I reviewed it after the block, and I find you made the exact same revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamas&diff=prev&oldid=223804625 one], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamas&diff=prev&oldid=223937762 two],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamas&diff=prev&oldid=223999792 three] (an especially damning (to you) edit summary) and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamas&diff=prev&oldid=224036946 four] times within a period of around 48 hours. So you didn't technically break it, yes, but you can and should still be blocked on the lesser included charge of edit warring, particularly in light of your stated intention in the edit summary for the third revert. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC)}}