User talk:Topbanana/Archive 3

See Talk:Ralph R. Roberts (politician), in case it's not on your watchlist! PamD (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

: Wow, good catch! This leaves Robert Richford Roberts as our only notable Robert R. Roberts, making the redirect correct once more. Good job. - TB (talk) 07:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello Topbanana,

This is just to let you know that I've added a link to an archive of your talk page (User talk:Topbanana/Archive 2) on the talk page itself. JIP | Talk 09:16, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article William W. Jones has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:William W. Jones|request that it be undeleted|request that it be undeleted}} when you are ready to add one. MJ₉₄ 22:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

: 19th century politician. The 'L' in 'BLP' does not apply. Reverted. - TB (talk) 22:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

::Good catch. My apologies. MJ₉₄ 22:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

{{tmbox

|style = notice

|small =

|image = Image:Updated DYK query.svg

|text = On 13 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Hyde Harris, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [http://stats.grok.se/en/201010/John_Hyde_Harris quick check] ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

}} — Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. No problem.   Will Beback  talk  22:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

{{tb|JohnCD|Hydropolitics in the Nile Basin}}

I undid your change to the link for :St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Catholic High School which is in Washington State. If the two schools have the same name, then they need to be disambiguated. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

: Well spotted. Definitely a case of cross-eyed editing. The primary disambig page for schools named for St. Seton seems to be Seton High School. I've added the Summerlin school to this list for now, assuming that it's a high school rather than a junior. If you know better, please do correct me (again!). - TB (talk) 21:17, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

: Awww, thanks! - TB (talk) 08:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

{{Mbox

|type = notice

|image = 50px

|style = background:LightYellow; color: black; border: 1px solid gold; font-weight: bold;

|text = Hi there! I thought you might be interested in the December 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We're currently recruiting help to clear a massive backlog (22,000+ articles), and we need your help! Participants in the drive will receive barnstars for their contributions! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Guoguo12--Talk--  22:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

}}

Ah that is odd! I wonder what were all those links to begin with? In that case sorry for the revert! :) Cheers!Calaka (talk) 11:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

:: Beats me - I spent 15 mins trying to work it out and failed. I can only imagine it to be a fault in the replication between the live Wikipedia servers and the toolserver database from which the report was created. A quick check of the top 20 showed the other entries to be more or less accurate. If not perfect, then probably more useful than the 2-3 year old reports we had before. Ho hum ;) - TB (talk) 12:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

I answered your question at WT:TWP yesterday. It shouldn't be too hard to create a template from the skeletion I provided. Mjroots (talk) 08:17, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

: Have replied there now, ta. - TB (talk) 10:15, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi, you changed Pan American Championships to Pan American Racquetball Championships on the Jennifer Saunders entry. Is that really necessary? I mean, it's an entry about a racquetball player, so can't we safely assume that she was playing in a racquetball championship? If it was a soccer player playing in the World Cup, would it have to be the FIFA World Cup? I don't know. Seems a bit much to me and perhaps goes against Strunk and White's dictum to omit needless words. Cheers. Trb333 (talk) 14:00, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

: Ah - I see the source of confusion. The links in Jennifer Saunders (racquetball) were piped the wrong way round. Originally Pan American Racquetball Championships, I retargetted them from the disambig page to the raquetball comp, making them Pan American Racquetball Championships, abbreviated to just Pan American Racquetball Championships. I'd say that the originally intended Pan American Championships is neater and removes redundancy - please do adjust them. - TB (talk) 23:37, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning pn.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on :George Finkle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Nuujinn (talk) 02:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article William A. Redmond has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:William A. Redmond|request that it be undeleted|request that it be undeleted}} when you are ready to add one. Mhiji 03:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Dave Clark (Canadian politician) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Dave Clark (Canadian politician)|request that it be undeleted|request that it be undeleted}} when you are ready to add one. Mhiji 02:38, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

I saw your great work with updating Wikipedia:Most wanted articles and hoped you can do the same with Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/de 85.65.69.166 (talk) 23:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

: No problem, done. The entire list is over 20000 entries, I've posted the first 500 up for now. If you're willing to organise the full report into sensible chunks, I'll post it up for you. - TB (talk) 14:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article 1 E-7 m² has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:No idea what this even is. Redundant to the entire navbox.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 03:47, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

The best place to post a link that I can think of is Template talk:Lang. I did a similar exercise right after I created the template family and sorted the top "n" of them. Bear in mind that Lang is designed to work even with missing templates, and the template family is designed to be open to creative and constructive abuse. Rich Farmbrough, 21:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC).

:Having said that, yes I would still be interested to see the list. Rich Farmbrough, 12:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC).

::For your delectation (and as posted per your suggestion on Template talk:Lang): [http://toolserver.org/~tb/ISO639/ http://toolserver.org/~tb/ISO639/] - TB (talk) 13:12, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. For comparison: Template talk:Lang/Parameters used in 20080724 dump by frquency. Rich Farmbrough, 21:14, 9 December 2010 (UTC).

: Nice. I reached more or less the same place from a completely different direction - the elimination of unnecessary red links. Here, my usual mechanism for detecting red links that are 'near misses' of existing article titles showed up an unusually high number of false positives. Investigation showed that was deciding that a red link such as {{ISO 639 name gr}} might be a mistyped attempt at {{ISO 639 name gd}} and so forth.

: [http://toolserver.org/~tb/ISO639/ http://toolserver.org/~tb/ISO639/] is a live report driven from the toolserver database - it should represent the 'live' Wikipedia database and continue to do so indefinitely. Hopefully it'll help keep the number of language-template redlinks to a minimum. - TB (talk) 22:06, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

::Still popping back to the list occasionally do a little clean-up - of course gr links here... gr is mainly used (wrongly) for Greek "el" is modern Greek, "grc" is ancient Greek. Also picked out Lang-ba which was using "bb" instead of "ba" - a nice win. Rich Farmbrough, 21:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC).

::: Glad to know the tool's of use, thanks. Have unlinked {{ISO 639 name gr}} from here. - TB (talk) 17:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Get Ready to Wiggle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:Not even near to satisfy WP:NSONGS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Muhandes (talk) 10:13, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Glad to see you're back. A suggestion; fixup projects have moved on, you know ;) Check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Punctuation and one of their child pages, such as [http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~tom7/periodbot/281000-283000.html]. An edit link on your project lists, taking us into the article needing editing in edit mode (and maybe filling in the edit summary with proganda) would help us all. I've put you in the active wiki fixup list, as you'll have seen. --Tagishsimon (talk)

I have recently come across your project and was wondering if and how I could become a part of it. Please could you let me know. Thanks, Oddbodz (talk) 21:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:21, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi. When you removed the old page contents from Viking Hellas, it would have been better to have checked the page history of that page and the redirect target. Upon doing so, you would have seen that this was a cut-and-paste move that needed a history merge. Removing the old text from the redirect just covers up the improper move and makes it harder for others to identify. Sorry if this comes off as critical; I had the same type of message left for me a couple of years ago by another editor, and it has made me more aware of this issue ever since. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:19, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

: I consider myself suitably chastised, educated and enlightened, thanks. Lacking any mention of elderberries, I did not read any intention to offend in your message ;) - TB (talk) 20:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

{{talkback|Elonka}}

Hi. Sorry if my comment on your Boulevard Theatre question was not helpful. I thought you were just another theatre loon, like myself, in search of obscure information on the oldest profession*. I was mistaken...oops. I would think the Sarah Townsend (and I'd bet a dollar on Figge Norling) "Boulevard Theatre" refs should link Soho:Raymond_Revuebar for now. Maybe I'll get crazy someday and create a separate article for the place....or, given the dearth of sources, probably not. * That would of course be theatre...You can't have prostitution without acting:)

:Do I smell elderberries? Now I'm hungry for some reason. Odd. -- ArtifexMayhem (talk) 15:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

: Nah - nice to know I wasn't being daft; there is some confusion requiring an expert's attention. Much appreciated.

::I wonder why the little comments? - TB (talk) 20:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

::Not sure about the little comments. Habit? No thanks. I don't wear one. -- ArtifexMayhem (talk) 20:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:Scotland Map.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:Scotland Map (Firth of Clyde Detail).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Hey just wanted to drop a line in thanks for deleting the redirect on the page I moved. I'm stil having trouble understanding the deletion process but i'll get it sorted eventually! Thanks again - Pereirab04 (talk) 01:50, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Please note that {{tl|convert}}, when used to convert kg → lb, requires an extra rounding parameter when used in infoboxes for people, and probably also in many other cases. This is documented in {{tl|Infobox sportsperson}}. I've fixed a few that happen to be on my watchlist, but no doubt a great many more will need fixing also.

More generally, the biggest problem with this template is that people use it without appreciating the need to get the rounding right. I suspect there are hundreds, maybe thousands of such errors out there - not a problem I have time to investigate and fix properly at the moment .

--NSH001 (talk) 23:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

: Ta for the heads-up. My corrections were to address broken entries such as {{convert|62|Kg|lb}} ( {{convert|62|Kg|lb}} ). My own inclination was to {{convert|62|kg|stlb}} ( {{convert|62|kg|stlb}} ), but I understand {{convert|62|kg|lb|0}} ( {{convert|62|kg|lb|0}} ) to be the recommended use. - TB (talk) 08:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

:) – SJ + 22:18, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

naveenpf (talk) 11:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

:Yum! - TB (talk) 08:05, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

The band Dr. Steel mentioned on the page about former Yugoslav band Heller is a Croatian heavy metal band, with no connection with the American musician to which Doctor Steel (band) redirects to. Ostalocutanje (talk) 11:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

:Cheers. I've modified the red link to Dr. Steel (Croatian band) for now to (hopefully) avoid future confusion. - TB (talk) 13:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

The tool you're using is resolving redlinks in a way that makes the content visible to readers incorrect. Hyphen and en-dash aren't equivalent—they have distinct meanings and in many cases your changes are going from right to wrong. If you think that the hyphenated-form target is correct, then please use a piped link so that the visible text remains the en-dash. In many cases, the hyphenated form is already just a redirect, so may as well pipe the actual page-target instead of switching to hyphenated. Otherwise you could create the en-dashed form as a redirect so that anyone looking for that (correct) name could find the right page. But the whole redlink problem requires some manual consideration, since [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diels%E2%80%93Alder_reaction&diff=448587467&oldid=443598690 this one] is correct (the use of hyphen).DMacks (talk) 14:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

: Howdy DMacks. I'll put my hand up and say that I don't really understand the difference in meaning between nine different midline Unicode dashes (my fave being the "Coptic capital-letter dialect-p ni" whose name itself contains two other different types of midline dashes). What I do beleive is that, for the most part, "Trans-Kalahari Highway" is more useful to our average reader than "Trans﹘Kalahari Highway", regardless of which is the more correct. If someone wiser in the ways of punctuation that I has the time and inclination to rename articles and update links to them, I'll be delighted. - TB (talk) 15:08, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

:: That one was a good fix. I have no idea what that character in Trans﹘Kalahari Highway is. But don't replace en dash with hyphen unless you know it's correct. Moving an article or redirect is often the better fix (but not always, so you have to know what you're doing!). Dicklyon (talk) 20:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

I have reverted and fixed a number of your en dash changes. Please do not do such things if you don't understand what you're doing. Fixing the redlink by breaking the text is a step backwards. Learn more at MOS:DASH. Dicklyon (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

: Good job, Dicklyon, and thanks for fixing the muddled hyphens and en- dashes. You're quite right in your assessment that I don't know what I'm doing with regards to the assorted midline Unicode dashes - they're largely identical-looking punctuation marks to my slightly myopic eyes. I would however respectfully disagree that my changes are a "step backwards"; while a casual user of Wikipedia is unlikely to be confused by a slightly longer or shorter than correct dash, a red link might lead them to miss out on finding useful content. Consider perhaps that my changes are in fact a "step forwards", albeit a smaller one than achieved by our combined efforts. I'll continue marrying up links and titles, and you sort out the typographics and between us we'll improve the encyclopedia. - TB (talk) 21:30, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

::Hi, just noticed this on DL's contribs list. Could I add my voice to his advice that en dashes should be preserved (and indeed introduced) where appropriate. I noticed one for an airport that did look like the right change to a hyphen, though. Any help you need, please ask. Tony (talk) 21:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

::: Thinking this through, the assumption driving my (assuredly unintentionally) contentious edits is that article titles are correct and that article text should be adjusted to match them where they were the intended target of a link. Of course, this isn't always a good assumption. Reading MOS:DASH, a rough and ready rule of thumb would be that an article title should be assumed 'incorrect' if:

:::*It contains any hyphens or

:::*It contains an en-dash that is not bounded by spaces (excepting the ‐ article itself of course) or

:::*It contains an em-dash that is bounded by a pair of either spaces or Arabic numerals

::: Ignoring the other midline dashes {Hyphen-minus (-), non-breaking hyphen (‑), figure dash (‒), small em dash (﹘), hyphen bullet (⁃), modifier letter minus sign (˗), and Coptic capital letter dialect-p ni (Ⲻ)}, do these rules seem correct to you dash-experts please? - TB (talk) 22:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

::::No, that sounds ridiculous. Why would a hyphen be assumed to be incorrect? Why would you think most en dashes would have spaces around them? Dicklyon (talk) 22:09, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

:::::Dicklyon, I am not trying to sound ridiculous. I am however trying to solicit your constructive input. Perhaps rephrasing my question in more open terms would help. I understand that some article titles containing midline dashes are incorrect with regards to MOS:DASH, and therefore it is not wholly desirable to adjust the text of red links to match them. Is there any easy way to identify these titles? - TB (talk) 22:36, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

::::::There is no automatic way; you have to understand and then decide what's right, as with most inconsistencies that you'd want to fix. One special case should be easy: if your text has an en dash, and you're thinking of fixing it to a hyphen because there's a redirect by that name, and that redirect goes to an article with an en dash, then it's a good bet that the consistent en dash in the text and in the article title are correct, and you just need a new redirect. I did some of those. Dicklyon (talk) 23:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

How did you decide to make a new redirect [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karl–Heinz_Thun&redirect=no here]? Have you ever heard of someone with an en dash in their first name? Why make a redirect where it's wrong, but skip it where it would be right? Flipping a coin? Can you fix please? Dicklyon (talk) 04:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

And [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dale_Purves&diff=448903023&oldid=438665296 here] you put an em dash into a person's name! Wacky! Dicklyon (talk) 05:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_organic_reactions&diff=449065780&oldid=448584139 Here] I undid 5 bad ones in a row on one article. Pairs of names of different person need an en dash (but two-part names like Lennard-Jones need a hyphen, so be careful). Dicklyon (talk) 05:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

And [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_lemmas&diff=448903272&oldid=448597239 here] you stuck an em dash between two names! What possesses you to come up with these atrocities? Dicklyon (talk) 06:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

: Morning Dicklyon. In the first case above, the (incorrect? I've no idea) Karl–Heinz Thun was used in three places. Redirecting that title to the article Karl-Heinz Thun marries up all three redlinks with their intended target. This immediately aids readers in finding content; consider it a 'redirect from misspelling' if you will. This in no way precludes you or anyone else who cares about the length of their dashes from tidying things up. In the second case I again have no idea what is 'correct' by way of MOS:DASH and have therefore piped the original text of the red link. Other than the link now taking a reader to the correct article, there is no visual difference. I see you've since removed the piped text, turning this into a natural link - good job. In the third and fourth case, I've made the assumption that the writer of the five articles knew better than I what dashes to use in thier articles. I see you've gone ahead and renamed the five articles, making my changes to links redundant.

: Dare I suggest that in each of these cases we've *both* improved matters in our own areas of concern? If my use of dashes is "wacky" or an "atrocity", then so is it wrong that a link be unecessarily red because of a typographic nicety. - TB (talk) 06:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

I have made a number of changes based on the two reports I'm listing below. Please rerun these reports.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Uncatted stubs
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stubs catted via redirects

Thanks! Dawynn (talk) 11:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

: Done - TB (talk) 11:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi TB, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 20:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

hey thanks for pointing me out to the tool as per ES. Will test it out later.--Cerejota ^{If you reply, please place a {{t|talkback}} in my talk page if I do not reply soon.} 21:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

{{talkback|Katarighe|ts=22:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)}}

Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

{{talkback|RP459|ts=05:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)}}

-- RP459 ^Talk/_{Contributions} 05:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the link! I actually don't speak Portuguese, I do speak Spanish though. But anyway, thanks for the link like I said. Lighthead ^þ 20:08, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

: You're welcome to use the tool in any language of course ;) You've added 'pt-3' (intermediate Portugese) to the babel tag on your userpage in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ALighthead&diff=prev&oldid=149035241 2007], hence my message. - TB (talk) 20:25, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

{{tb|Waldir}}

Hi, I just found your note on my talk page. I'd be happy to help you, but I wonder if I can. My family is Brazilian on one side and American (USA) on the other. I've been living in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. on and off again since we moved here when I was in primary school, and while DC is truly a melting pot of people, still few speak Portuguese, and I never attended school to learn to read and write in my primary language-- so much was lost! The other problem is that other than editing the Wikipedia(s) and email, I am completely ignorant as to how to really use the internet. However, I'm happy to help in whatever capacity I can! Perhaps I can learn something new, who knows? :) --Leahtwosaints (talk) 01:08, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Just wanted to say thank you again for the list of disability links - happily working down them and they are making a difference to the project ;)

as quick feedback, there's some strange results for things like Article/File links - all of the ogg links that the tool turned up were fine... also as a feature request, would it be possible to generate results without the transclusions? The majority of the Olympic results, for example, are all the same transcluded table processed repeatedly... will keep working thought the list :) Failedwizard (talk) 15:54, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

: Never a problem.

: * Red file-namespace links reported (such as the ogg links you describe) are probably showing up because the target exists on commons, but not the English-language Wikipedia. The MediaWiki system's a bit clunky behind the scenes, I'm afraid.

: * Determining if a red link arises from on article, a template transcluded by that article or indeed both is not easy I'm afraid. Easier to filter by hand in most cases.

: Shout if and when you need the list regenerated. - TB (talk) 16:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

::Interesting, thank you very much... out of interest - you mentioned earlier that the code was more-or-less open source - where would I go to have a look at it? More as a case study in how wiki tools work than anything else... Failedwizard (talk) 12:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

::: [http://www.toolserver.org/~tb/RLRL/source.tar.gz Here you go] - I really should pop it into SVN, but am a cowboy coder at heart ;) - TB (talk) 13:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article James L. McPherson has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:James L. McPherson|request that it be undeleted|request that it be undeleted}} when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Topbanana, would you mind if I copy User:Topbanana/RLRL SR Utility.js into my userspace and make some small tweaks? Thanks, Hard Boiled Eggs [talk] 11:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

: Of course you can. Let me know what you do with it, I'll be keen to incorporate any improvements. - TB (talk) 12:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

:: Thanks, duplicated at User:HardBoiledEggs/RLRL SR Utility.js. I'll let you know if I come up with anything suitable for general consumption. Hard Boiled Eggs [talk] 13:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

::: See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AHardBoiledEggs%2FRLRL_SR_Utility.js&action=historysubmit&diff=454888533&oldid=454706138 some changes] -- I've set it up so that it ticks the 'minor' box and runs the replace. I can then go through and submit, and then use popups on my contributions page to quickly review all the changes. Hard Boiled Eggs [talk] 16:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

:::: I've found an even quicker solution - the script now clicks the 'show changes' button after running the find-replace. I can now load up 50 suggestions from your tool, open autofixes in tabs, and then run through all the tabs reviewing changes and clicking save. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AHardBoiledEggs%2FRLRL_SR_Utility.js&action=historysubmit&diff=455213014&oldid=454706138 diff]. Hard Boiled Eggs [talk] 04:26, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

::::: Nice - just had a go of this. It's definitely an improvement when the simple search and replace operation is correct, but less flexible where additional manual editing is required. How feasible would it be to use your version as the default behaviour but provide a new button to give the old behaviour for those trickier cases? ie click AUTOFIX -> open wikipage with S&R applied showing diff -> click 'manual search and replace button' -> show wikipage with populated search and replace boxes - TB (talk) 17:00, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

:::::: I'm sure it can be done. The key challenge would be getting the original find and replace data to pass through to the diff page, such that we then have all the info we need to go back. I wouldn't want to stick data like that in cookies, and I don't know if mediawiki will mind us tagging random data into the querystring. (Then again, I suppose that's exactly what you do with the AUTOFIX links.) I'll give it a go when I have a chance - unless you want to write the code?

:::::: Note that I've also added a 'Save' button up the top of the page, so that when flicking through tabs the button is in the same location and the user can quickly review the diff and save the page without having to move the mouse. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:HardBoiledEggs/RLRL_SR_Utility.js&diff=455558813&oldid=455213014 diff]. However, it isn't actually working at the moment. (edit: have since fixed the code) Hard Boiled Eggs [talk] 18:29, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

:By the way, here is the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AHardBoiledEggs%2FRLRL_SR_Utility.js&action=historysubmit&diff=455634182&oldid=455213014 correct diff for the extra save button]. Hard Boiled Eggs [talk] 16:53, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

:: Cheers. I'm hoping to get a chance to integrate your changes in the new few weeks. - TB (talk) 16:59, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on :List of microcars by country of origin: X requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. hewhoamareismyself 20:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi there! Just so you know, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blagoveshchensky,_Russia&curid=30972080&diff=459659012&oldid=459460390 this] isn't right. You are changing the link to the article about the town called "Blagoveshchensk" in the Republic of Bashkortostan, but the red link is to the (not yet written) article about a village called "Blagoveshchensky" in a different part of that republic. I suspect you are working from some automated report, no? If so, please adjust. If it helps, I can create a short stub about the village (but if that's a problem with some automated report, that needs to be addressed as well). Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); November 8, 2011; 17:51 (UTC)

: Thanks. Will check. - TB (talk) 17:52, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

:: Definitely a glitch - all fixed now, ta. - TB (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

:::Thanks for taking time to look into this!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); November 10, 2011; 19:24 (UTC)

Hi, that wasn't a particularly helpful move—disambiguation pages where there are only topics to disambiguate are little more than clutter, and an inconvenience to 100% of readers looking for an article on a Charles Egerton, rather than the percentage looking for the politician rather than the field marshal. I'm going to put the article on the field marshal back at the original title unless you think the politician is the primary topic and that his article should be at that title. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

: As far as I can tell, there are 5 Charles Egerton's mentioned in various Wikipedia articles - 2 politicians, 2 (3?) soldiers, and 1 horse trainer. Of these the 17th century politician and early 20th century soldier are clearly notable, and I suspect the other politician and one of the soldiers to be also. For now, I've separated the clear two out and left the remainder of links pointing to the disambig page. Happy for you reorganise to taste; my thinking in having the disambig page as the 'primary topic' was that it had incoming links for multiple people. Folks are going to link to it without being aware there are many Charles Egertons; at least this way a reader isn't blindly led to the wrong (and possibly confusable) subject. - TB (talk) 21:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

There seems to be a bit of a mess here - over to you. (I stub-sorted the politician, then looked at incoming links and disambiguated the one in 2009 Grand National as Charles Egerton (racehorse trainer), but the more I looked the messier it seemed.) PamD 22:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

:Hadn't read the above when I posted this, but will still leave it to you to sort out now. There are a handful of incoming links to Charles Egerton which need attention. PamD 22:58, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

The incoming links have now been addressed (except those on people's user pages, but I never feel comfortable to change them). I think the 3 politicians have now been separated out clearly, and the redlink to the horse trainer's been added; I created an article on one of the MPs but there's one still to be done. Well done for unearthing this, TB, hopefully users will be able to find what they're looking for now. Justthe other soldiers to be found, but I didn't have any luck there. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 07:59, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Hey, I've noticed that you've sped up the red link tool to the point where it's usable in interactive speed. I was wondering if you'd be interested in improving Dab solver's red link suggestion. It currently does a reasonable job for a typically disambiguation pages, but due to speed constraints (avg<1s, max<15s), it can only search using prefixes in various fixed patterns. This fails with names and similar cases. — Dispenser 21:28, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

P.S. You need to valid your HTML and there's XSS attack in RLE (try entering " onclick="alert("Hi")). — Dispenser 21:28, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

: Ta - on hols right now, but will check in a few days. - TB (talk)

:: Okay, I've had a look at the Dab solver now - very slick indeed. Two options for grafting generalied redlink suggestions onto the tool:

::# On-the-fly at a cost of around 1 second per red link, typically giving 3-5 suggestions with around a 50% chance of one being 'correct'.

::# A periodically generated pre-calculated list of suggestions. Typically 2-3 suggestions per red link with a 65% chance of one being 'correct'. A table covering all namespace-0 red links would be around 5GB in size including index.

:: Both of these are more-or-less built and ready to use; due to sheer volume of redlinks, I've been concentrating on producing higher quality lists (1-2 suggestions per red link, 90% chance of one being 'correct'). Have you a preference ? - TB (talk) 13:10, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

::: Sorry about the inexplicable the absence. The second method is probably what I'm after, unless the first method is uniquely different from my implementation. For disambiguation pages 2-3 can be on the low side. Anyway, it's the implementation that I'm concerned with. The options as I see it:

:::# I re-implement it in python. Advantages: less work for you, resources (MySQL concurrent limit, timing, etc) can be managed better. Disadvantages: Update can be a pain, extra work if databases need to be shared.

:::# Implement a server-side serialization (e.g. JSON over HTTP). Advantages: Update the internal is easy. Disadvantages: Changing the look or output requires some extra communication. Also, timing and resource (15 connection limit) are in your hands.

:::# Load results into an iframe. Advantages: Complete control. Disadvantages: Non-uniform look and resource management issues, also the slowest.

:::— Dispenser 08:01, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

:::: Okay, sounds good to me. For option 2, our simplest interface would be a single table with two columns: redlink varbinary(255), suggestion varbinary (255). UTF8 character set and collation, non-unique index on column redlink. Table location name, and additional columns as suits yourself. The generation process is running now - should take less than 50 hours to run. Sample data follows:

+---------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| redlink                                           | suggestion                                      |
+---------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| "Mr.Hardcore"Rico_Suave                           | "Mr._Hardcore"_Rico_Suave                       |
| %_ACV_distribution                                | %_PCV_distribution                              |
| 'Abd_al-'Aziz                                     | 'Abd_al-Aziz                                    |
| 'Abd_al-'Aziz                                     | 'Abdu'l-'Aziz                                   |
| 'Abd_al-Razzaq                                    | 'Abd_ar-Razzaq                                  |
| 'Abd_al-ghani_al-Nabulusi                         | 'Abd_al-Ghani_an-Nabulusi                       |
| 'Abdu'llah_bin_Jasim_Al-Thani                     | 'Abdu'llah_bin_Qasim_Al-Thani                   |
| 'Abdullaah_Ibn_'Umar                              | 'Abdullah_Ibn_'Umar                             |
| 'Amr_ibn-Hind                                     | 'Amr_ibn_Hind                                   |
| 'Ayn_al-'Arus                                     | 'Ayn_al-'Arab                                   |
| 'Galway'_Joe_Dolan                                | 'Galway_Joe'_Dolan                              |
| 'Sang_Lingo_nAPO_sila                             | 'Sang_Linggo_nAPO_Sila                          |
| 'Tiny'_Rowland                                    | "Tiny"_Rowland                                  |
| 'night,Mother                                     | 'Night,_Mother                                  |
| 'night,Mother                                     | 'Night_Mother                                   |
| 'night,Mother                                     | 'night,_Mother                                  |
| 's-Gravenambracht                                 | 's-Gravenambacht                                |
| 's_Gravenvoeren                                   | 's-Gravenvoeren                                 |
| 's_Gravenwezel                                    | 's-Gravenwezel                                  |
| (11024)_1986_QJ1                                  | (11024)_1986_QC1                                |
| (1726)_Hoffmeister                                | 1726_Hoffmeister                                |
| (2-aminoethyl)phosphonate—pyruvate_transaminase | 2-aminoethylphosphonate—pyruvate_transaminase |
+---------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+

:Urgh - something horribly wrong with the generation process, the results are aren't great. I'll debug and run the thing again in the next day or two. In the meantime, you're welcome to a smaller set of test data. - TB (talk) 15:07, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Washington Union High School District. Since you had some involvement with the Washington Union High School District redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 20:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi Topbanana. Re: Your correction to Drama Centre London article. The name of the College IS Central Saint Martins College of ArtS (in the plural) and Design. The name was changed in spring 11 to coincide with the move to King's Cross and acknowledges the inclusion of the performance arts in the college provision. Please reverse your edit. Thank you. Viotor 214Victor214 (talk) 11:55, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

: Howdy Viotor, thanks for letting me know about this. Prior to my edit, the article Drama Centre London contained a link to Central Saint Martins College of Arts and Design. This link was 'red' as we haven't got an article at that exact title. After checking that the similarly named article Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design was about the relevant institution, I corrected the red link to refer to it instead.

: If St. Martins have renamed themselves, you should be able to add this information to Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design yourself, remembering to include a reference. You should also be able use the 'move this page' facility to give the article a more correct title (Central Saint Martins College of Arts and Design).

: None of this should be impacted by my edit to Drama Centre London, although once completed would make it unnecessary. If you'd like help making the changes above, reply with an appropriate reference and I'll sort things out. Cheers. - TB (talk) 21:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

::*{{tps}} From the college website at http://www.csm.arts.ac.uk/ it looks as if the current name is plain "Central Saint Martins" - no mention of "College of Art(s) and Design". So perhaps the college article ought to be updated and moved to that title, with copious redirects from older versions both with and without the apostrophe which looks to be grammatically needed but is apparently not used, and with and without the s of "Arts", and with "Saint" and "St" and perhaps "St."! (and from "Central Saint/St/St. Martin's" too). .... Wow, just had a look, and it has 34 incoming redirects including most of those variations, but not yet the "Arts and Design" versions: someone has done a good job there. PamD 22:37, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

:::*And I notice that the University's website http://www.arts.ac.uk/ refers to the college as Central Saint Martins College of Arts and Design, as Victor says. Interesting! PamD 22:43, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

::::*And I've just made a redirect from that version of the name, so the above redlinks will now go blue. PamD 22:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

:::::*And a few more redirects from other variations - any of which might help a reader find what they want, or prevent an editor from carelessly creating a red link or a duplicate article.

: Nicely done, PamD. - TB (talk) 08:43, 4 December 2011 (UTC)