User talk:Travellers & Tinkers

Hello, Travellers & Tinkers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, visit the Teahouse Q&A forum, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Deathlaser (talk) 15:03, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Kahastok talk 22:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Only mostly insane but the only way to fix it is from the inside. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtpaley (talk • contribs) 22:52, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Image:Ambox notice.svg Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Kahastok is disrupting a GA attempt) Martinvl (talk) 00:04, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

The page WP:FALKLANDSUNITS has not yet been formally adopted as an offical guideline. I have created a proposal to regularise the position. Please feel free to comment Wikipedia talk:WikiProject South America/Falkland Islands work group/Units#Proposal for acceptance as a formal guideline. If the proposal is accepted, then the page will indeed be part of Wikipedia policy, otherwise it will be tagged a "failed proposal". Either way the uncertainty that has dogged this page for the last three years will be resolved. This message is being sent to every editor of good standing who has contributed here or here. Martinvl (talk) 03:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

I've moved your vote in the open RFA to the discussion section. In order to vote in the RFA you must be extended-confirmed, and despite your tenure, you lack the required 500 edits. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:54, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg Your recent editing history at :Keith Self shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}You've been notified of intent for discourse in the talk page and have chosen to ignore it once already. Address the concerns on the page before engaging in any further editing. Azyn (talk) 01:21, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

:You have once again reverted my edit without engaging in discourse on the talk page. Refrain from doing so once more or you will be met with an administrative involvement request. Azyn (talk) 01:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

::I have responded on the talk page, and I'll repeat it here. If I understand you correctly, you removed two sections because they were incorrectly under the heading "political positions". I moved them so they are not under that heading. Travellers & Tinkers (talk) 01:27, 4 April 2025 (UTC)