User talk:Trev Swain

Welcome!

Hi Trev Swain! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button 2|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :List of cultural references to the September 11 attacks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please review WP:IPCV as well. DonIago (talk) 05:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

:Hi Doniago. While I use a pseudonym here on Wikipedia, I am the author of the book. Is that a reliable enough source? Trev Swain (talk) 05:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

:If so, please restore my original edit. Trev Swain (talk) 05:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

:Also, the Citing Sources page you provided a link to states, "Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space." (emphasis added). I am uncertain how or why the edit I made could be challenged, given it is an addition of a novel to a list of books bearing cultural references to the September 11 attacks. Please explain. Trev Swain (talk) 05:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

::Did you read WP:IPCV, which I referred you to in my above message? For "in popular culture"-style entries, a source must be included to establish that the reference has received attention from secondary sources.

::Additionally, if you're the author of the book then you have a conflict of interest and should not be adding your own book to Wikipedia articles; that comes across as potentially promotional. Instead, you should consult with other editors at the article's Talk page. DonIago (talk) 13:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

style="margin: 1em 4em;"
valign="top"

| File:WP teahouse logo 2.png

|

Hi Trev Swain! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, {{tq|Added a book I authored to a list, and had the edit reverted for not providing a reliable source}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Added a book I authored to a list, and had the edit reverted for not providing a reliable source}}.

See also the help page about the archival process.

The archival was done by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 5 June 2022 (UTC)