User talk:Vajkimzeej
{{Talk header}}
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[User:Vajkimzeej/sandbox|sandbox]] (January 14)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vajkimzeej/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:Vajkimzeej/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Vajkimzeej/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello, Vajkimzeej!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC
January 2024
File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Paperboy 2 for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at :Talk:Paperboy 2, you may be blocked from editing. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 17:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
:Your opinion has been removed three times. Take a hint. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 17:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
ok —-Vajkimzeej (talk) 17:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
::And there is zero reason for you to manually clear the sandbox. It clearly states "Any user can edit this page and it is automatically cleared regularly (anything you write will not remain indefinitely)." soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 21:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at :Draft:IOS 18. Hajoon0102 💬 06:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 01:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
:I have warned you before: you seem to be going for some WP:PGAME, with your weird rants on your talk page and continuing to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=1197523952 manually reset] the sandbox. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 01:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:IOS 19|IOS 19]] (January 22)
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=iOS 19 is currently too far away from release - it is WP:TOOSOON. The information that might exist is currently speculative and is not fit for an article.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IOS 19 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:IOS_19 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gorden_2211&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:IOS_19 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Gorden 2211 (talk) 03:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:IOS 18|IOS 18]] (January 22)
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Wikipedia does not publish articles on rumors and speculation}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IOS 18 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:IOS_18 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:IOS_18 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
KylieTastic (talk) 08:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:IOS 18|IOS 18]] (January 23)
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=pointless resubmission with no improvement - Wp:TOOSOON}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IOS 18 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:IOS_18 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:IOS_18 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
god is the creator of earth--Vajkimzeej (talk) 22:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
:yes. i know Vajkimzeej (talk) 22:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
::i know that Vajkimzeej (talk) 22:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
:::i just know that Vajkimzeej (talk) 22:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
::::I. JUST. KNOW. THAT!!!!!!! Vajkimzeej (talk) 22:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::I JUST KNOW ThAt! Vajkimzeej (talk) 22:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::I jUsT kNoW tHaT! Vajkimzeej (talk) 22:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::i JuSt KnOw ThAt! Vajkimzeej (talk) 22:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
I use n iPad
February 2024
File:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in :Pac-Man, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Wikipedia doesn't asterisk out swearwords, per WP:BOWDLERIZE. Belbury (talk) 19:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Information.svg Hi Vajkimzeej! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of :Pac-Man several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at {{TALKPAGENAME:Pac-Man}}, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Welcome
Hey there, I saw your user page and wanted to send you this page in case you haven't seen it already: Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors
It has some pretty useful advice all in all. Happy editing. Mlkj (talk) 20:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ... discospinster talk 03:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)sorry I was sleeping —Vajkimzeej (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
I Am Like: 😢—-Vajkimzeej (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was sleeping I promise to contribute again :( |decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- #understand what you have been blocked for,
- #will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- #will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed |1=I Am Trying To Help. |decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- #understand what you have been blocked for,
- #will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- #will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 17:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)}}
: Non-admin notice here, I'm not confident this request will be accepted either. You still seem to not really understand what your block was for, or how this process really works. Now, an admin will review your request and determine how things go, but my suggestion would be, if it is declined, don't put another unblock request until you have read the guide to appealing blocks page, and understand it. Then, too, I would also think it'd be a good idea to wait at least a few weeks. If you do not do this and just keep spamming the unblock post, you will end up losing the ability to edit your talk page, making unblock requests impossible, at least as far as I know, there could be a way but I don't know of any other way. -- ThatOneWolf (ChatEdits 17:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed |1=i am leaving forever… |decline = Clear WP:CIR issues. WP:UTRS is available for appeals. Ponyobons mots 23:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)}}