User talk:Wekeepwhatwekill

File:TWA guide left bottom.png

:::::Hi Wekeepwhatwekill! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

::::::* The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page

::::::* The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge

::::::* The Teahouse new editor help space

::::::* Wikipedia Help pages

-- 12:46, Friday, November 1, 2019 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:TWA/Navigation2}}

Referring specifically to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Usernames_for_administrator_attention&diff=prev&oldid=929538186 this edit] in which you openly acknowledge that you know it is stale and therefore not a real problem. It's also worth noting that WP:UAA/I, which I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wekeepwhatwekill&diff=923477704&oldid=919217322 asked] you to please review back in October, explicitly says "Sharing issues are not for UAA. Names that imply account sharing are not serious enough for UAA. Do not report them unless there are other serious username policy violations. For actual account sharing, first ask the users to stop sharing and discuss the issue at ANI if they refuse." UAA experiences regular backlogs, so it's really not helpful to be posting pointless reports like this. Pretty much the only exceptions to the "staleness" rule are accounts that attack or impersonate specific living people. Since you did not reply in any way to my previous comments on your username reporting (and you use bot archiving, so there's no assurance you're even reading this page) I would appreciate some sort of written acknowledgment that you have seen this message. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk)

In reference to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pauley_Perrette&curid=21037528&diff=936881788&oldid=936865888 this edit], Pauley's [https://twitter.com/PauleyP Twitter account] is a verified account. Notice the little blue check mark. So, it's not a case of "[a]nyone can set up an account and say they're someone else." It's really her and Twitter verified. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 21:40 on January 21, 2020 (UTC)

{{Tmbox

| style = background: #f8eaba

| image = 55px

| text = This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{tlx|unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. – bradv🍁 18:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)}}

:Came here with the intention of reverting contributions made by this person in violation of socking policy, but I got bored when I realised that almost all of their "contributions" are useless jabbering. The damage has already been done when actual good faith contributors are forced to interact with people like these in discussions, who are clearly just here to be racist. What a pitiful attempt at trolling. — Bilorv (talk) 09:15, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

::Now that I've taken a closer look at the contribs it all adds up. How sad. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

:::Yes, I knew there was something familiar, but I couldn't put my finger on it. The cluelessness over Wikipedia policy (like claiming the Wikipedia:Service awards denote some actual recognised status) was a giveaway, with hindsight. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)