User talk: WackyWikiWoo

|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

|}

|}

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Ultimate Custom Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Storm Area 51 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 20px This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 04:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

The article Storm Area 51 you nominated as a good article has passed 20px; see Talk:Storm Area 51 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Place (Reddit) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 20px This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

The article Place (Reddit) you nominated as a good article has passed 20px; see Talk:Place (Reddit) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Updated DYK query.svg

|imagesize=40px

|text = On 29 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Storm Area 51, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Storm Area 51" was a comedic Facebook event intended as a raid on Area 51 in search of aliens? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Storm Area 51. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2020-04-19&end=2020-05-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Storm_Area_51 Storm Area 51]), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}} — Maile (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

{{Tmbox

| style = background: #f8eaba

| image = 55px

| text = This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry{{#if:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WackyWikiWoo| per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WackyWikiWoo}}. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{tlx|unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 12:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed | 1= I wasn’t aware making accounts for quick edits here and there was not allowed. I made them to avoid using my IP, because I like to use my main account for edits relating to internet culture, almost as its “purpose”. I have not used any of these accounts to make disruptive edits. I understand the rule now and will not do this again. WackyWikiWoo (talk) 15:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC) | decline = Per Berean Hunter's comments below. The "but I didn't know the rules" defence is not plausible in this case. Yunshui ^雲_水 22:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)}}

• What other accounts have you used for editing?
• Please read and affirm understanding of Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Alternative account notification. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 00:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

{{ping|Deepfriedokra}} The main account I have used is this one, the others were “throwaway” accounts I created, not knowing about the policy you’ve linked. I have read and understood it now.WackyWikiWoo (talk) 07:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

:Please disclose the complete list of other accounts you have used. --Yamla (talk) 13:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

::{{ping|Yamla}} They’re on the investigation page, but I’ll reproduce them here:

• {{checkuser|Hyo14225}}
• {{checkuser|Heaveho672}}
• {{checkuser|Gagao091}}
• {{checkuser|Habada245}}
• {{checkuser|Heyo2346}}
• {{checkuser|Gnaome162}}
• {{checkuser|Wedstox346}}
• {{checkuser|Sunman120}}
• {{checkuser|Cartrisge273}}
• {{checkuser|Covid12}}
• {{checkuser|Shahahaha}}

::WackyWikiWoo (talk) 02:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

:::Nothing you've said is truthful. Take a look at :Category:Requests for unblock and see that your request has been seen by the project's admins for a week and no one is accepting of your story. Now, you can double down and try to insist that you have been truthful with us or you can revise your unblock request and be honest with us this time.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

::::{{ping|Berean Hunter}} I’m not sure why what I’ve said is so surely untruthful. Given that none of the edits were disruptive, I don’t know what you believe the purpose of these accounts to be other than what I’ve said. I did not know of the rule, and have stated I understand the rule now and I won’t do it again. Even if you think I am lying, can’t I be unblocked on the basis that I understand the rule and won’t make the same mistake again? WackyWikiWoo (talk) 08:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

:::::No, because we do not accept insincere unblock requests and because I don't believe you that you didn't know that it was policy. Your reply that you didn't know sounds like you are trying to game the system. You've only offered up the accounts that you've got caught with and none of your previous accounts. I don't think this was your first account either.

:::::You used your main account to make [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_on_social_media&diff=952007282&oldid=952000713&diffmode=source this edit] and then returned to that article with five other accounts to remove sections and remove tags ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_on_social_media&action=history article history]). This makes your statement, {{green|"I made them to avoid using my IP, because I like to use my main account for edits relating to internet culture, almost as its 'purpose'"}} into absolute nonsense. You used your main account on the article in the first place and there would be no logical reason to create accounts or use your IP for any kind of followup editing. Why would you make the statement that you were avoiding using your IP? Why would it cross your mind to do logged out editing at all? That shows deceptive thinking. Also, you weren't {{green|"making accounts for quick edits here and there"}} as it takes more work to create the accounts than it would to have simply used your main account for quick edits. You also created several accounts above to hold in reserve...you didn't use them for any editing at the time. Shows intent on your part...and frankly, there is something wrong with the notion that creating many accounts is normal behavior. It isn't and anyone trying to sell that idea shouldn't be trusted.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 16:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Gradual Liquidation.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:PlaceReddit.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Place (Reddit) has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 19:53, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Gradual Liquidation.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)