WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MrBill3 reported by User:Jjibber76 .28Result:.29

Page: {{pagelinks|Sokoban}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|Go D. Usopp}}

Previous version reverted to: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sokoban&oldid=1297799799]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sokoban&diff=1298118613&oldid=1297990377]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sokoban&diff=1298827978&oldid=1298630262]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sokoban#Lead_wording_about_creator_and_release_date Talk:Sokoban — Lead wording about creator and release date]

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sokoban#Lead_that_frames_the_article Talk:Sokoban — Lead that frames the article]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGo_D._Usopp&diff=1298867018&oldid=1298498766]

Comments:

Hello. There has been an ongoing disagreement over the wording of the lead section.

After reverting a bold edit with a descriptive edit summary, this user reinstated their version without initiating discussion on the talk page, which is not in line with BRD.

To avoid participating in an edit war, I started two extended talk page topics, and later I participated actively on it.

After discussion for about 3 days, and without consensus, I reverted back (mentioning this in the edit summary). Now, the user reinstated their contested version again.

Additionally, in an edit summary and on the talk page, this user has made comments that might be considered non-collaborative:

Comment 1: "This is WP:OWN territory to disregard others' edits".

Comment 2: "Boldly reverting others".

Carloseow (talk) 06:52, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

:For both comments, I was reminding you about the policies of WP:OWN and WP:BADREVERT. Your constructive edits and knowledge on the topic are appreciated, but reverting my edits to dispute every small detail isn't a good way to facilitate conversation. I appreciate reversions of my good faith edits with reason, but this is on a level beyond what I consider reasonable. It's frustrating to edit this particular page when all of my edits are scrutinized by minute detail, instead of editors improving on each other's edits for the benefit of Wikipedia. Go D. Usopp (talk) 08:21, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

:(Non-administrator comment) @Carloseow & @Go D. Usopp, why not use WP:RFC? —tony 15:54, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

::{{AN3|p}} In full. For a week. Because I had to do this before a little over a month ago. And since we don't like to do this too much, if you come back here with another request in about the same amount of time I will just block both of you from the page indefinitely. I don't want that and neither do you. Get some other people involved in this discussion. Please. Daniel Case (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Page: {{pagelinks|List of Lego themes}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|Bricktoy123}}

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. {{diff2|1299085995|13:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)}} "I’ll explain to you: real LEGO themes and franchises that appear in LEGO themes are mixed up, for example, LEGO Back to the Future is not a theme: two sets were released of this franchise, a LEGO CUUSOO set in 2013 and 10300 BTTF Time Machine in 2022. The case of LEGO The Lord of the Rings is similar: it was listed as current because of 10316 Rivendell, released in 2023, but that’s LEGO Icons; this franchise had sets as a separate theme around 2012, therefore being a discontinued theme."
2. {{diff2|1299083591|13:11, 6 July 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1299082692 by MrOllie (talk)"
3. {{diff2|1299081585|12:50, 6 July 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1299079880 by Soetermans (talk)"
4. {{diff|oldid=1298841932|diff=1299079261|label=Consecutive edits made from 12:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC) to 12:28, 6 July 2025 (UTC)}}
5. {{diff2|1299078691|12:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Current themes */"
6. {{diff2|1299079261|12:28, 6 July 2025 (UTC)}} ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. {{diff2|1299080309|12:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Removal of content, blanking."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

New user, not understanding basic editing etiquette. And style guidelines for that matter. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 14:53, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

:Then talk about it, Soetermans, not just undo the things that were done. You can only write in scornful way, but explaining anything is really far away from you. I suspect you don’t know anything about LEGO. Bricktoy123 (talk) 15:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

::It would be beneficial if you started talking. I do not consider myself "scornful" because you are edit warring. It's okay that you're new and inexperienced, but after receiving several messages and warnings in such a small time, you should've figured out you're going at it the wrong way. Like right now, that you suspect I know nothing about Lego isn't helping. It's Lego and not LEGO as far as Wikipedia is concerned, which you've been told already, but you also keep adding in. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 15:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

:::What’s the problem then? The deletion of citations? I’ve added them back later on. Bricktoy123 (talk) 15:11, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

:::Are you talking about Lego being fully capitalised? In my edits, I write them Lego. Anyway, I find it a really silly thing as it’s LEGO, actually. Bricktoy123 (talk) 15:15, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

::::I don’t understand and really hate this style you (Soetermans, SleepyRedHair and MrOllie) do. Many improvements are made on the articles – LEGO Architecture, LEGO Art, LEGO BrickHeadz, LEGO Icons, LEGO Ideas, List of LEGO themes –, but you revert them and leave them lose because you don’t like the style (which is the exact one, actually) in which I edited the texts. If you wouldn’t be silly, you would edit the articles normally and not just revert them. Bricktoy123 (talk) 15:28, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

• {{AN3|b|48 hours}} Partially blocked from the article.Acroterion (talk) 15:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Page: {{pagelinks|KBS News 24}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|211.251.53.225}}

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. {{diff2|1299212063|03:07, 7 July 2025 (UTC)}} "←Redirected page to KBS NEWS 24"
2. {{diff2|1299209489|02:47, 7 July 2025 (UTC)}} "←Redirected page to KBS NEWS 24"
3. {{diff2|1299208622|02:41, 7 July 2025 (UTC)}} "←Redirected page to KBS NEWS 24"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. {{diff2|1299214013|03:22, 7 July 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on :KBS News 24."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Repeatedly page move without consensus. Also on CGTN related pages. -Lemonaka 03:25, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

::{{AN3|b|48 hours}} Ordinarily, I'd have declined this as not violating 3RR. But it turns out that I have previously blocked this IP over a year and a half ago for disruption in the same topic area (Korean TV). I can only conclude they did not learn enough from that experience. Daniel Case (talk) 22:55, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Page: {{pagelinks|Penang}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|155.69.182.1}}

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penang&oldid=1299223441]
2. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penang&oldid=1299224000]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: User talk:155.69.182.1#July 2025

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Penang#Demographics of Penang, should we use the latest data?

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

Comments:

IP had demonstrated previous edit-warring conduct in 2 separate incidents, namely: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rail_transport_in_Malaysia&action=history Rail transport in Malaysia] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tourism_in_Malaysia&oldid=1294918239 Tourism in Malaysia] articles.

In the meantime, I have requested WP:3O on the article's talk page. hundenvonPG (talk) 05:14, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

:What? I think you were the first one to undo my edits and edit war, when I was just updating the stats to the latest one as published by government? See the edit history again perhaps? 155.69.182.1 (talk) 05:18, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

:Also in Tourism in Malaysia, you were also edit-warring, right? As mentioned by the admin. 155.69.182.1 (talk) 05:20, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

:Both of these users were warned about edit warring in June. I've fully protected the article for two weeks ({{u|HundenvonPenang}} requested page protection due to {{tpq|Persistent disruptive editing and edit-warring from IP, replacing prose with one that is incorrect grammatically.}} in addition to making this report), but I'm doubtful that action will be sufficient. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:22, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Page: {{pagelinks|NXT The Great American Bash (2025)}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|2600:4040:58D2:3C00:A552:36:5F90:D9DA}}

Previous version reverted to: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NXT_The_Great_American_Bash_(2025)&oldid=1299264434]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NXT_The_Great_American_Bash_(2025)&diff=prev&oldid=1299078267]

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NXT_The_Great_American_Bash_(2025)&diff=prev&oldid=1299174416]

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NXT_The_Great_American_Bash_(2025)&diff=prev&oldid=1299261427]

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NXT_The_Great_American_Bash_(2025)&diff=prev&oldid=1299261823]

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2600:4040:58D2:3C00:A552:36:5F90:D9DA&oldid=1299264497]

Comments:

Intentional removal of sourced content. Lemonademan22 (talk) 12:11, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

:{{AN3|b|24 hours}} The range: {{IPvandal|2600:4040:58D2:3C00:0:0:0:0/64}} Daniel Case (talk) 23:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Page: {{pagelinks|Pierre Poilievre}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|96.52.40.208}}

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. {{diff2|1299471590|16:10, 8 July 2025 (UTC)}} "Revision was valid, sourced and relevant. Undid revision 1299471179 by Zefr (talk)"
2. {{diff2|1299470108|15:58, 8 July 2025 (UTC)}} "Stop changing this. It is relevant and sourced. Undid revision 1299469493 by ARandomName123 (talk)"
3. {{diff2|1299469391|15:52, 8 July 2025 (UTC)}} "It is factual and relevant whether you like it or not. Undid revision 1299469191 by Weirdguyz (talk)"
4. {{diff2|1299468832|15:49, 8 July 2025 (UTC)}} "https://albertalabourhistory.org/a-shocking-racist-event-in-albertas-history-the-aryan-fest/, https://distributionarchives.cbcrc.ca/en/items/a102c48b-d577-448d-8192-d71ddd783ce8 Undid revision 1299468238 by Weirdguyz (talk)"
5. {{diff2|1299467949|15:43, 8 July 2025 (UTC)}} "It absolutely is referenced. Both in news articles and on wikipedia itself. Undid revision 1299467077 by Weirdguyz (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. {{diff2|1299470427|16:00, 8 July 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. {{diff|oldid=1299467169|diff=1299471067|label=Consecutive edits made from 15:38, 8 July 2025 (UTC) to 16:06, 8 July 2025 (UTC) on User talk:96.52.40.208}}

Comments:

IP repeatedly adding contentious material to a BLP. Weirdguyz (talk) 16:13, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

• {{AN3|b| 48 hours}} Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 16:15, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Page: {{pagelinks|Samma dynasty}}

User being reported: {{userlinks|Sir Calculus}}, {{userlinks|Ekdalian}}

Previous version reverted to: [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samma_dynasty&oldid=1299204168]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samma_dynasty&oldid=1299204168]

[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samma_dynasty&oldid=1299205036]

[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samma_dynasty&oldid=1299471847]

[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samma_dynasty&oldid=1299288444] (my sourced addition that was reverted)

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Samma_dynasty#Attempts_at_Persianization]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [to be added]

Comments:

I attempted to improve the Samma dynasty article by including a third reliable source after a previous soucre was contested. Despite posting reasoning on the article's talk page, both users reverted my edits without engaging in discussion. I resctfully request admin review for possible edit warring and failure to follow WP:BRD. Veritasphere (talk) 17:28, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

:I have reverted your edits once only! I couldn't see any consensus on the article talk page! Veritasphere, you could have given some time to Sir Calculus to respond, but you engaged in edit warring instead. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 18:06, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

User: Molikog

Article: Adult_human_female

1. [First revert](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adult_human_female&oldid=1295152611)
2. [Second revert](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adult_human_female&oldid=1295020257)
3. [Third revert](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adult_human_female&oldid=1295152611)
4. [Fourth revert](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adult_human_female&oldid=1295243443)
5. [Fifth revert](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adult_human_female&oldid=1299401822)

User Molikog has repeatedly reverted content on the article Adult human female without engaging in meaningful discussion or attempting to reach a consensus. This constitutes a violation of the three-revert rule (3RR) and is a clear case of edit warring.

Despite efforts by other editors to discuss and resolve content disputes, Molikog has consistently reverted between conflicting versions of the article, disregarding the collaborative editing process. This disruption undermines the work of others and prevents productive discussions about the article's content.

• Molikog has reintroduced content that was previously removed following discussion and consensus, without providing adequate justification or engaging in any further dialogue on the article's talk page.
• This repetitive pattern of reverting without consensus creates a cycle of undoing progress and impedes the editing process.

I respectfully request that the administrators review the diffs provided and take appropriate action against Molikog for edit warring. They have violated the three-revert rule (3RR) and their actions are disruptive to the collaborative process on this article.

A quick check on the edit history shows a very clear pattern of disruptive behavior on Wikipedia articles and starting Edit Wars on purpose with other Wikipedia editors. KangRay (talk) 21:36, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

:1 edit today. 1 edit yesterday. Almost a month to find the 3rd edit...so it doesn't look like they have, recently at least, violated 3RR on that article. --Onorem (talk) 21:45, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

::Kindly take a look at the edit history of Molikog and the numerous Edit warring he has initiated that has lead to numerous Talk pages being opened about his disruptive behavior that is becoming a bother to other Editors ...for example

::https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Anti-gender_movement#June_2025_edit_warring

::https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Adult_human_female#%22hate_speech%22 KangRay (talk) 22:02, 8 July 2025 (UTC)