WP:Articles for deletion/America Iglesias Thatcher
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America1000 07:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
=[[:America Iglesias Thatcher]]=
{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/America Iglesias Thatcher}}
:{{la|1=America Iglesias Thatcher}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=America Iglesias Thatcher}})
Even the obituary of Thatcher spends about as much time speaking about her parents (although oddly only attributed to her father, what of her mother?) practicies in naming their daughters. It provides little information on her, and the information procvided does not really seem to indicate she was notable. There is also no writer listed on the obitaury, which normally happens with staff written obituaries, so this may be a family sipplied one, which would not be a reliable indepdent source adding towards passing GNG at all. John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- There is a name drop on page 374 of a 1987 book that appears to be the memoire of an associate of hers. One name drop in such a long book is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 April 1. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Puerto Rico. Shellwood (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I did some searching on Google books and found 4 sources (including the one mentioned above). I added them in. They are all brief, but in the context of this not being BLP, I think it's enough to keep. CT55555 (talk) 12:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I still don't think the new sources added amount to notability, nothing beyond passing mentions it seems of her. Oaktree b (talk) 20:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.