WP:Articles for deletion/Complete Office Supplies

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per CSD G11: the entire article was written in advertising-speak, presumably by an undisclosed paid and/or COI editor Nick-D (talk) 09:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

=[[Complete Office Supplies]]=

:{{la|Complete Office Supplies}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Complete_Office_Supplies Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Complete Office Supplies}})

Promotional page with no significance. Fails WP:GNG Ireneshih (talk) 07:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Keep: company is noted by CEO Magazine, The Collective, Stationery News as largest stationary supplier, Supply Nation, Business First Magazine, Ethnic Business Awards, Office Products International (OPI), BRW (magazine) and others. No promotion. --Pounder39 (talk) 08:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
History merge with 10-20 system - This article was originally at 10-20 system until Pounder39 moved it to Complete Office Supplies.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Complete_Office_Supplies&type=revision&diff=695030291&oldid=537823880] He then recreated 10-20 system by cutting and pasting from Complete Office Supplies, which is inappropriate. The article does seem to be advertising and should be deleted. However, the cut and paste move needs to be fixed. I'm not sure of the best way to do that. Either delete 10-20 system and move the article back there, or history merge the two articles at 10-20 system. --AussieLegend (✉) 09:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

::I repaired 10 20 to correct my mistake. --Pounder39 (talk) 09:31, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.