Login
Login

WP:Articles for deletion/Tony Stringfellow

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ mazca t|c 11:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

=[[Tony Stringfellow]]=

:{{la|Tony Stringfellow}} ([{{fullurl:Tony Stringfellow|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Stringfellow}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Unreferenced, does not seem to pass WP's notability guidelines, v. little external coverage Richard Hock (talk) 16:16, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. I can't find any sources to support a claim to notability.  LinguistAtLarge  16:50, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep based on the sources found by JulesH.  LinguistAtLarge  05:48, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep and mark for cleanup. Review of one of his books [http://www.recordcollectormag.com/reviews/review-detail/1473 here]. Another one [http://www.famemagazine.co.uk/2007/09/25/marc-bolan-at-60-the-wizard%E2%80%99s-gown/ here]. Brief mention of his prop-making work [http://www.brillianttv.co.uk/wacaday/history.html here]. Featured in local radio show [http://wcrt.entadsl.com/cmsms/index.php?page=christmas-2008-programmes here]. JulesH (talk) 20:15, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Notable enough as a poet. Good grief we keep articles much less notable on third string footballers who have only played in a few games in their careers. Lets not dumb down wikipedia. Manitobamountie (talk) 17:10, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:32, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep - Passes WP:CREATIVE criteria with JulesH's sources. Matt (Talk) 09:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.