WP:Deletion review/Log/2022 July 11#TechEngage

:{{DRV links|Nuvve|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuvve|article=}}

There is more than one review (four in total): [https://www.rediff.com/movies/review/nevvu/20061106.htm here], [https://www.nowrunning.com/movie/3224/telugu/nuvve/931/review.htm here], [https://web.archive.org/web/20061119095340/http://www.telugucinema.com/tc/movies/nuvve_nov0303.php here], and [https://www.filmibeat.com/telugu/reviews/2006/nuvve-review-061106.html here]. There are release sources: [https://www.indiaglitz.com/nuvve-to-hit-the-screen-on-november-3--news-26314 here], [http://www.idlebrain.com/news/2000march20/news273.html here], and [https://mymazaa.com/telugu/news/nuvve-to-hit-the-screen-on-november-3.html here]. All in all, sufficient sources to restore the article. DareshMohan (talk) 08:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

• There isn't anything stopping you from recreating the article. If you want the deleted version restored to draft space to serve as a starting point then I'm sure that can be done, but there was hardly anything in it - just an infobox and a cast list. Hut 8.5 19:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
• Well, there isn't, but the question is that other than the Rediff review, are any of the other sources considered reliable? DareshMohan (talk) 00:36, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
• :You might want to try WP:RSN to get opinions on questions like that --81.100.164.154 (talk) 05:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
• Endorse if this is an appeal of the closure. Otherwise it isn't clear what is being requested. The title isn't salted and the author can always prepare and submit a draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
• Allow re-creation and re-submission through AFC. I don't see a good reason to prohibit re-creation and re-submission through WP:AFC given that there's been a good faith effort to find new sources. I'm not 100% convinced of its notability, but that's something that can be demonstrated by an article creator rather than required to occur here. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 03:47, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
• Either way please save the deleted version as a draft to work on. DareshMohan (talk) 07:49, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

:{{DRV links|TechEngage|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechEngage|article=}}

The Site passes GNG. The "News & Observer" and "Honolulu Star" articles are multiple examples of significant coverage from independent sources for the site to pass GNG. Jinnahsequaid (talk) 06:27, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

• Endorse. DRV is not AfD round 2. These sources were considered in the discussion where consensus was that they were not sufficient to demonstrate notability. Thryduulf (talk) 09:59, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
• :There are [https://www.dropbox.com/sh/gwtgh35jcms1yw6/AAAfPgU56oC-j3yU1F0zImLLa?dl=0 alot more sources] that were being missed in the previous review. I think we should consider it again. It includes many major newspapers, including Anderson Independent-Mail, Birmingham Post-Herald, Austin American-Statesman, Santa Maria Times, Eastern Wake News, Ventura County Star, The Miami Herald, The Knoxville News-Sentinel, The Miami News. (And all of them has covered it for multiple years and in multiple times). Further, I added a news clip of 2010 of News & Observer so no one can say it' for only 2-3 years. I don't have the full subscriptions to fetch the whole lists. Hope, you will be satisfied with it @Thryduulf
• :For me, it's enough to pass the GNG. Jinnahsequaid (talk) 11:10, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
• ::Just rewrite the article as a draft from the ground up based on the supposedly GNG-compliant sources. I do not think a deletion review is needed to get permission to recreate a deleted article; WP:G4 (which states that any copies of AfD-deleted articles can be deleted ASAP without warning) doesn't apply to recreations that don't copy anything from the originally deleted article. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 23:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
• Endorse as the right summary of the AFD. Significant coverage was considered in the AFD. The title has not been salted and the appellant can submit a draft for review with the better sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

:{{DRV links|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syed_Basar|xfd_page=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Syed_Basar|article=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syed_Basar}}

The person is a notable billionaire businessman Aaeeshaaadil4 (talk) 04:46, 11 July 2022 (UTC)