WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 November 13#Portal%3AHarry Potter

• {{no redirect|1 = Deserae Morin }} → :Rape threat#Against politicians  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deserae_Morin&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-10-14&end=2019-11-12&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Deserae_Morin stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Deserae Morin|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Deserae Morin closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Deserae Morin|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Deserae Morin closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Deserae Morin|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Deserae Morin closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

This person was an unsuccessful candidate for the Vermont House of Representatives in 2018. She did receive a rape threat during her campaign, but the target article subsection only contains a single sentence on her, and it arguably is WP:UNDUE for that page since it is a minor local story. Nblund ^talk 21:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and also because she is a WP:BLP. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  02:58, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
• She isn't. She's a living person, and so the BLP policy applies with regards to her, i.e. she is a WP:BLP subject, but she is not a biography. (sorry if this seems pedantic but I dislike people referring to human beings as biographies or as policies). Thryduulf (talk) 09:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 09:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = 96 (upcoming film) }} → :Vijay Sethupathi  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=96_(upcoming_film)&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-10-14&end=2019-11-12&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=96_%28upcoming_film%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:96 (upcoming film)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#96 (upcoming film) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:96 (upcoming film)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#96 (upcoming film) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:96 (upcoming film)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#96 (upcoming film) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

The film was released in 2018. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 20:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

• Delete, no longer upcoming. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
• Delete as there is no history for it to merge over to (film). AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Rafa Siguion-Reyna }} → :Yagit  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rafa_Siguion-Reyna&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-10-14&end=2019-11-12&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Rafa_Siguion-Reyna stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Rafa Siguion-Reyna|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Rafa Siguion-Reyna closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Rafa Siguion-Reyna|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Rafa Siguion-Reyna closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Rafa Siguion-Reyna|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Rafa Siguion-Reyna closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

This actor was never part of this series. He was part of Yagit (2014 TV series) but only as a guest cast. Redirect not needed.   Sub |_HMU  18:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

• Weak delete I have no familiarity with this subject, but if the nom's statement is correct then this redirect should be deleted. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:19, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = 3rd Prototype }} → :Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3rd_Prototype&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-10-06&end=2019-11-04&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=3rd_Prototype stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:3rd Prototype|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#3rd Prototype closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:3rd Prototype|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#3rd Prototype closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:3rd Prototype|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#3rd Prototype closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Name is not exclusive to the turbojet engine, nor to the music artist connected to this redirect's previous target, NoCopyrightSounds. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

:Looks like a blocked vandalism account changed it from the record label to the engine (which was likely a completely random target). 3rd Prototype is in the artists listed so I guess it wouldn't hurt to simply revert back to the original intention. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 08:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

• Revert to NoCopyrightSounds. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Hot cuts }} → :Roasting  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hot_cuts&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-10-05&end=2019-11-03&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Hot_cuts stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Hot cuts|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Hot cuts closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Hot cuts|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Hot cuts closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Hot cuts|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Hot cuts closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

All the examples of this phrase in relation to meat that I found online seemed to just generically refer to still-hot meat, and not limited to specifically roasting. IMO the ideal target for this would be Meat cooking, but no such articles exist. Other possible targets could be Meat, Cooking, or the antonym Cold cuts, but given that those are all fairly far removed from hot cuts, deletion may be a better option. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

: I was thinking of a carvery as the best example of a hot cut of meat (compared with a cold cut) and carveries tend to do roasts.Sturmovik (talk) 06:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

• Retarget Carvery, which is a closer topic match and the opposite of cold cut. Deryck C. 15:58, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
• Delete as ambiguous. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
• Delete as an ambiguous term with no clear target. Hot cut could refer to telecommunications, popular music, blacksmithing, beak trimming, etc. - Eureka Lott 21:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
• Delete since hot cuts could refer to anything random. Better still, disambiguate. Ambrosiawater (talk) 08:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per above, especially Ambrosiawater, without prejudice (of course) to someone re-creating as a disambiguation page. Doug Mehus T·C 02:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Holcus spp }} → :Holcus  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holcus_spp&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-10-14&end=2019-11-12&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Holcus_spp stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Holcus spp|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Holcus spp closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Holcus spp|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Holcus spp closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Holcus spp|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Holcus spp closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Delete Abbreviation meaning "various species of the genus Holcus". The are [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=100&offset=0&profile=default&search=intitle%3Aspp&advancedSearch-current={%22fields%22:{%22intitle%22:%22spp%22&ns0=1 about 50] other redirects from "Foo spp" or "Foo spp." to genera named Foo. This form of abbreviation is well-attested collectively but is it a likely search term at all? If it is useful to have a random assortment of 50ish redirects of this form (but not standardized in whether to have a period after spp), should redirects of this form be created for tens of thousands of other genera? Plantdrew (talk) 03:26, 13 November 2019 (UT)

• Delete I can understand that such a 'spp' redirect might be useful for some speciose, "difficult", and ecologically important genera like Juncus,Carex, or Sphagnum, (I have a temperate bias!) but the redirects don't seem to be used, even in those cases. There is currently one main space link for Eucalyptus spp. To format the abbreviation properly, only the genus name should be in italics, so a pipe is still required (e.g. Eucalyptus spp.) William Avery (talk) 09:39, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.