WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Davenbelle/Archive

__TOC__

{{SPIarchive notice|1=Davenbelle}}

{{SPIpriorcases}}

===<big>16 May 2010</big>===

{{SPIcat}}

;Suspected sockpuppets

  • {{checkuser|1=Jack Merridew}}

;Evidence submitted by   — Jeff G. ツ

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jeff_G.&diff=362502168&oldid=362494489 This edit]   — Jeff G. ツ 21:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

;See also Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Moby Dick#Findings of fact.   — Jeff G. ツ 21:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

;Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

true enough, and there are moar ;)

Sincerely, Street-Legal Sockpuppet Jack MerridewFile:Puppeter template.svg 21:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

;Comments by other users

  • Close this posthaste, please. This is old news and not actionable. ÷seresin 21:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Davenbelle is an former sockpuppeteer. He is now using the username 'Jack Merridew'. He has been unblocked per the direction of the Arbitration Committee. User:Jack Merridew/History explains more. NW (Talk) 21:42, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

{{SPIclose|archive}}

----

===<big>4 April 2016</big>===

;Suspected sockpuppets

  • {{checkuser|1=Br'er is back! (jokes, he never left)}}
  • {{checkuser|1=Jumbo willy}}

Auto-generated every hour.

  • [http://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py Editor interaction utility]

Similar name to one of the socks. Posted a barnstar [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Br%27er_Rabbit&diff=prev&oldid=713447881 here] at User talk:Br'er Rabbit, a Davenbelle sock. Please see this suspected sock's talk page where he says he's not a sock, but rather an old friend. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:02, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Evidence for Jumbo willy per [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Br%27er_is_back!_(jokes,_he_never_left)&diff=713453797&oldid=713453315 this]. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

====<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

There is absolutely no way that either of those two accounts bear any sort of behavioural relationship to the editing of Davenbelle, Jack Merridew, etc. Nobody looking at Jumbo willy's immature contribution history could possibly confuse that with Jack's editing. Somebody's muddying the waters, but it's very unlikely to be Jack. --RexxS (talk) 21:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

====<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====

----