WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Mitscientist/Archive

__TOC__

{{SPIarchive notice|1=Mitscientist}}

{{SPIpriorcases}}

=29 April 2018=

==Suspected sockpuppets==

  • {{checkuser|1=Gujwonwoman}}
  • {{checkuser|1=Divergenes}}
  • {{checkuser|1=Wanhao22china}}
  • {{checkuser|1=Indy90210}}
  • {{checkuser|1=Superfalcon1}}
  • {{checkuser|1=Gyb11}}

  • Tools: [https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py Editor interaction utility] • [https://tools.wmflabs.org/interaction-timeline?wiki=enwiki Interaction Timeline] • [https://tools.wmflabs.org/betacommand-dev/cgi-bin/uc?uc=Mitscientist User compare report] Auto-generated every hour.

Per [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard&oldid=838754311#Bhargav_Gajjar_-_more_academic_promotional_editing this report at COIN], these accounts are pure, 100% SPA focused solely on Bhargav Gajjar and topics related to him (his company, his underwater robotics research, etc). Only socks 1 and 2 (Gujwonwoman and Divergenes) are still active. These are all blockable on the very clear SPA basis. I waited to file this until both of the active accounts had edited very recently, in case anybody thinks a CU is actually necessary, and Divergenes edited again today; Gujwonwoman edited four days ago. A glance at Talk:Bhargav Gajjar will show you that these are clearly the same person. More academic promotion. Jytdog (talk) 06:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

==<big>Comments by other users</big>==

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

==<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==

  • {{Requestandendorse}} - Please, compare {{noping|Gujwonwoman}} to {{noping|Divergenes}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  • The two accounts are {{confirmed}} to each other. Blocked without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Everything else is stale, we can hit them when they come back. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

----