WP:peer review

{{redirect|WP:PR|the Public Relations FAQ|Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects|patrolled revisions|Wikipedia:Patrolled revisions|the guideline on the use of press releases|Wikipedia:Third-party sources#Press releases}}

{{redirect|WP:PEER|the wikiproject on nobility peerages|Wikipedia:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage}}

{{For|the Wikipedia guideline about pending changes|Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes}}{{for|the review of new pages|Wikipedia:New pages patrol}}

{{Peer review tab header}}

{{shortcut|WP:PR|WP:PEER}}

{{pp-move-indef}}

File:PR icon.png

{{Peer review sidebar}}

Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working on, or receive advice about a specific issue queried by the editor. The process helps users find ways for improvement that they themselves didn't pick up on. Compared to the real-world peer review process, where experts themselves take part in reviewing the work of another, the majority of the volunteers here, like most editors in Wikipedia, lack expertise in the subject at hand. This is a good thing—it can make technically worded articles more accessible to the average reader. Those looking for expert input should consider contacting editors on the volunteers list, or contacting a relevant WikiProject.

To request a review, see the instructions page. Nominators are limited to one review at a time, and are encouraged to help reduce the backlog by commenting on other reviews. Any editor may comment on a review, and there is no requirement that any comment be acted on. Editors and nominators may both edit articles during the discussion.

You can find the list of all current peer reviews in different formats: a list with reviewers' comments included, a list without any reviewers' comments or a list by date.

{{TOC limit|limit=3}}

{{caution|The peer review list on this page is automatically generated: please follow the steps on the instructions page to add or remove a review.}}