WT:Arbitration Committee

:Original discussion

{{atop}}

:This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

{{ivmbox|1=In line with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FClarification_and_Amendment%2FHeader&diff=1255388543&oldid=1245603703 updates to procedural documentation] made in November 2024, Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Format of requests for amendment is amended by motion with the following change:

:{{tq|(d) The rationale for the requested amendment, comprising no more than 1000 500 words.}}}}

Enacted – HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 20:32, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

{{ACMajority|active=14|motion=yes}}

Support:

1. Proposing and supporting based on discussion on-list, following the inconsistency being discovered in early April. Daniel (talk) 05:56, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
2. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:04, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
3. s/1000 /500 /g Cabayi (talk) 06:52, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
4. Aoidh (talk) 07:35, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
5. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:19, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
6. Elli (talk | contribs) 10:22, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
7. Primefac (talk) 11:12, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
8. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:50, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
9. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:56, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
10. Z1720 (talk) 03:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
11. Katie^talk 20:14, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Oppose:

1. Just because it's inconsistent doesn't necessarily mean we should harmonize it without further thought. We tend to have a lot of back and forth with ARCA filers, and it's easy for them to go over 500 words. I would rather us carve out that ARCA filers get 1000 words. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 08:17, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Abstain:

{{abot}}