WT:WikiProject Sociology

File:Information.svg

There's an RfC on whether the current article is consistent with NPOV and a second RfC on whether to keep the current lead or replace it. LogicalLens (talk) 06:04, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

There is an Article for deletion discussion that may be of interest to some here on a new article, Femosphere. More information about it may be found here. FULBERT (talk) 17:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I've been thinking, right now there isn't any article that if focused on the overall impact of human migration. The main human migration article covers the topic of migration overall, but I think there might be room for expansion on the topic, enough for a separate article. ★Trekker (talk) 12:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Talking articles for Autism hard of hearing and Down syndrome for learning something new to read + taking notes. 64.83.167.131 (talk) 17:16, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

While reviewing math articles, I tripped over the article Uses of trigonometry which seems to be some kind of original research into the history of trigonometry, or the sociology of it, or some history of engineering, or I don't know what. It's certainly terrible as a math article per se, and I'm not sure what to do with it. It could be PRODed and AfD'ed of course, but perhaps it could be turned into a worthwhile article in epistomology or something like that. I'm posting this note in several other wikiprojects, as I'm not sure what else to do with it. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 05:01, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi all — I’ve opened a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Roseto_effect#h-RFC:_Is_the_current_framing_and_sourcing_for_the_Roseto_Effect_article_appropria-20250509022300 Request for Comment] at Talk:Roseto effect about whether the article’s current framing and sourcing comply with WP:MEDRS and WP:NOTABILITY. The article presents a historically influential case study in social cohesion and cardiovascular health, with modern sourcing to frame its relevance and limitations.

Input from editors familiar with medical or sociological sourcing would be very welcome. Thanks! -- ke4roh (talk) 02:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sexual diversity#Requested move 23 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. LIrala (talk) 05:39, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Google Search Pushashapor63 (talk) 21:10, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Google Pushashapor63 (talk) 21:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Google Pushashapor63 (talk) 21:26, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

N migration. Pushashapor63 (talk) 21:32, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Google Search Pushashapor63 (talk) 21:36, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Google@Google Search Pushashapor63 (talk) 21:42, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

@google Pushashapor63 (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

The article Collingridge dilemma mentions the term “double-bind problem” in its lede. As it is, the lede spends about as much space on explaining that problem as on explaining the lemma itself. However, that's not the right place for it. A glance on the German Wikipedia shows how it should be done: de:Collingridge-Dilemma refers the explanation to de:Doppelbindungstheorie. (Since that belongs in psychology and communication science, I'm posting the question here.) That article has no English counterpart, which surprises me, because it's a long article. Now, there is an article Double bind, which however in my layperson's view seems to be a different topic. Or are they in fact the same and the article needs to be changed to encompass both uses? ◅ Sebastian Helm 🗨 06:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

I have nominated Diocletianic Persecution for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 16:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Feminist economics has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Legal history of cannabis in the United States has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Royal intermarriage has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:15, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2002 Gujarat riots#Requested move 25 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 09:16, 12 July 2025 (UTC)